4026 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
Materials reuse cost of zeroCI-v4.1 MRc4: Sourcing of Raw Materialsposted by Emily Deydier on Sep 26, 2024, 7:54 pmof 160% for the sustainable criteria value in the summary, which seems like a lot! Thank you all for your help, Emily MRc4 ... |
|
Input of Solar Energy in ARCEBOM-v4.1 EAp3: Energy Performanceposted by Pulak Goyal on Oct 1, 2024, 6:30 amI have a whole building going for LEED EBOM v4.1 certification. The owner uses onsite generated renewable energy besides the energy from the grid. Out of the total renewable energy production, most of it is used by the owner, and the rest is exported. Out of the used energy, a lot of it is also sold as RECs. I have input the energy sold as RECs as "purchased from grid", and the remaining energy (after excluding the exported energy also) is input as "generated onsite solar". Is this the right way to enter this into ARC? EAp3 South America ... |
|
Ordinance says no new minimum parking needed for ParksNC-v4 LTc7: Reduced parking footprintposted by Akshaya Bhaskar on Oct 4, 2024, 11:39 amWe are currently working on a 4000 sq ft park shelter project located in an existing park in Madison, Wisconsin. The local ordinance states that parks and playgrounds do not have a minimum parking requirement. There is an existing parking lot associated with the site. we are not adding or reducing any parking. Would we still meet the the reduced parking credit requirement if we do not add any reserve car pool spots in the parking lot as we are not doing any work in that area? Thank you in advance LTc7 U.S. and Canada ... |
|
LTc4 and buildable landNC-v4 LTc4: Surrounding density and diverse usesposted by Jacopo Cattaruzzi on Oct 21, 2024, 8:33 amthat prohibits new constructions; therefore only small additions to existing building (up to 10%) can occur; A very few lots inside point 2 area which currently have building and could actually build some small... |
|
EA Prerequisite: Operational Carbon Projection and Decarbonization PlanLEED v5 BD+C/ID+C: Energy and Atmosphere 2nd Public Commentposted by Jamy Bacchus on Oct 24, 2024, 4:16 pmelectrical grid emissions or district energy emissions or refrigerant leakage emissions, which I am suggesting be added. We want to strive towards zero emissions buildings. I would rename the paths "Plan for..." or "Design for..." Zero Emissions by 2050. ... |
|
Add provisions for reuse to "Planning for Zero Waste Operations"LEED v5 BD+C/ID+C: Materials and Resources 2nd Public Commentposted by Crystal Dreisbach on Oct 28, 2024, 3:16 pmfor washer/dryer, adequate plumbing, hot water booster, and storage shelving. Ensure in the building design provisions for water filling stations. Please consider renaming this section from “Planning for Zero Waste Operations” instead to “Planning for No- to Low-Waste Operations”. (Zero waste is a problematic and discouraging term.) ... |