Tristan Roberts Representative Vermont House of Representatives LEEDuser Expert 11477 thumbs up August 14, 2020- 7:34 am Hi Emily, I agree with you that this is an area where your eligibility for RP credits is affected in a way that is probably non-intentional. Bottom line, I would ask GBCI if they can help. As you point out the LEED Online mechanism is automatic but they might have a workaround for this. To play devil's advocate, the argument I can see GBCI making is that LTc1 is a convenience credit that replaces more detailed documentation of other LT credits. Convenience doesn't come...

depletion potential (ODP) of zero and a global warming potential (GWP) of less than 50, then this option should be fine too. Also, you may want to provide cut sheets/manufacturer's documentation showing...

12:01 pm Received this comment that appears to be in line with these questions. "Turf grass has been included in the calculations as vegetated open space. Note that areas of turf may only be included...

Hi,  I have a question regarding an existing building that will undergo a major renovation. There is a separate parking garage that is not connected to the building however it was included in the purchase of the lot. The parking garage had a fire a few years ago and is in need of renovation and large part of the garage is closed off due to it is deemed too unsafe for usage. The owner has plans to renovate the garage, however the renovations of the garage is not planned to be included in the scope of work for the major renovation of the main building. Is it possible for us to exclude the garage from...

Good Morning, we have submitted this credit in the design review, but in the Design Final Review Decision the status is "ready for review" and not "anticipated" like the others. Can you tell me why? Thanks a lot IDc2 Italy ...

as a typical group restroom. As long as all of your occupants have access, the % per line item should remain 100%. What will be different is the field at the top-ish, under the occupancy table, where you'll...

We recently received the review result of a LEED v4 Commercial Interior Project. The reviewer is asking for proof whether all mandatory requirements of section 9.4.1 for lighting control have been met?  From our earlier projects going for LEED V4 CI, we havent received any such comments. By simply reducing LPD and installating Daylight and Occupancy Sensors, we used to comply.  Now after checking ASHRAE 90.1 2010 Section 9.4.1 requirements, a lot of requirement might not be able to make.  What is the way forward here?  EAp2 ...

at delivering recycled/regional/VOC product data and EPDs/HPDs seem to be reaching that point now. But even if that weren't the case this level of review detail seems like a lot of effort for little gain...

occupied space as two line items in the v4.1 calculator: one with the compliant and one with the non-compliant area, to account for portions of a regularly occupied space that does not have a quality view....

Andrey Kuznetsov ESG consultant, LEED AP BD+C Self Employed LEEDuser Basic Member 33 thumbs up May 11, 2024- 3:02 pm Not for you (since a lot of time passed) but for others with such question- yes, it's possible to certifiy all this buildings as one according to LEED interpretation 10203, but one must be sure that all requirements of this interpretation are met: 1. The buildings included in the LEED certification must be a part of the same identity. For example, the buildings are all part of the same elementary school and not a mix of elementary school and high school buildings together...