Topic | Recent |
---|---|
feasibility for USACE projectsPilot-Credits IPpc98: Assessment and planning for resilienceposted by Alison Kerr on Aug 1, 2024, 12:14 pm
The credit can be documented and achieved for USACE projects, and it is in line with Army customer increased attention to resilience. However, there is little to no feasibility for the building... |
|
easily feasible for DoD projectsPilot-Credits WEpc153: Water Leak Detection and Monitoringposted by Alison Kerr on Aug 1, 2024, 12:11 pm
Since building monitoring systems are already requied this is a low-cost Pilot credit that ties easily into most deisgns. |
|
Pilot INpc155 and DoD constructionPilot-Credits INpc155: Design for Indoor Air Quality and Infection Controlposted by Alison Kerr on Aug 1, 2024, 12:03 pm
This pilot credit is our first go-to in our office because we work on DoD projects, and the requirements are already covered under UFCs. No design impact. |
|
Name incorrect, and usefulness for USACE in-house designPilot-Credits IPpc90: Social equity within the operations and maintenance staffposted by Alison Kerr on Aug 1, 2024, 12:08 pm
IPpc90 in LEED Online, v4, BD+C is "Social equity within the project team." Not "...the operations and maintenance staff." My comment is regarding the Project Team Pilot credit. This... |
|
Existing Building or Commercial interior?LEED Rating System Selectionposted by Ammar Yahia on Jul 31, 2024, 4:53 am
We have an existing 45 Storey building consist of 2 basements, ground, two mezzanine, and 40 floors. since the owner tendered a renovation & Maintenace work, replacing all the MEP... Last reply: Kara Strong, Aug 1, 2024, 11:18 am |
|
"with errata but without addenda"NC-v4 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Alfonzo Collins on Nov 7, 2018, 10:58 am
The LEED v3 reference book already refers to ASHRAE 90.1 "with errata but without addenda." The v4 book only says "with errata." Does that imply that all addenda to ASHRAE 90.1 must be followed... Last reply: Bipin Karki, Aug 1, 2024, 10:41 am |
|
Best replicating natural site hydrology processesNC-v4.1 SSc4: Rainwater managementposted by Allen Cornett on Aug 4, 2021, 5:40 am
If the rainwater that is captured and used for flush fixtures meets the percentile thresholds can this credit be successfully attemtped? If the rainwater is used for the flush fixtures it would... Last reply: Alexander Postnov, Aug 1, 2024, 4:40 am |
|
Single LEED building in Zoo: Demand Response Plan required for entire Zoo?NC-v4 EAc4: Demand responseposted by Joyce Kelly on Jul 31, 2024, 4:53 pm
Wondering if the... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jul 31, 2024, 5:26 pm |
|
Reuse/ Salvage Materials for Option 2- Path 4NC-v4.1 MRc1: Building life-cycle impact reductionposted by Eslam Elshorbagy on Jul 30, 2024, 2:58 pm
Hi everyone, I would like to clarify the difference between... Last reply: Dave Hubka, Jul 31, 2024, 8:45 am |
|
Energy Star Commercial WasherNC-v4.1 WEp2: Indoor water use reductionposted by Michael Mantai on Nov 20, 2019, 6:32 pmI successfully followed this guidance and simply excluded larger washers: https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/forum/industrial-washer-vs-commercial... I submitted a project for review (v4, not v4.1) a couple... Last reply: Emily Purcell, Jul 30, 2024, 5:30 pm |