4027 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
EMICODE Accepted by GBCI?NC-2009 IEQc4.1: Low-emitting materials - adhesives and sealantsposted by Omer Moltay on Mar 29, 2010, 4:08 pm(µg/m3). US VOC limits for adhesives go for testing of VOC content in a can of non-used liquid adhesive and gives results as g/l. There is no correlation between both- except if there is absolutely zero VOC... Last reply: Reinhard Oppl, Dec 29, 2010, 7:37 am |
|
Limit Boundary-NC-2009 SSp1: Construction Activity Pollution Preventionposted by gabriel Morales on Dec 6, 2010, 5:42 pmwill be of interest by others. This is the project:-Zero lot line mixed use project with three buildings and underground parking.-Only one of these building will apply for LEED certification.-The project will be built by phases, being phase 1 the construction of the LEED project building and the entire uderground parking lot that will be shared with all buildings (LEED and not LEED buildings), this phase 1 is defined... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Dec 28, 2010, 9:45 pm |
|
Elaras Question- LEED Certification for High-Rise Multi-familyGeneral forumsposted by Dan Ackerstein on Dec 28, 2010, 7:09 pmfor that, but current status is not entirely clear to me. Anyway, bottom line is that the EBOM rating system can do it, but it may be a bumpy ride... LEED 2009 EB-O&M ... |
|
gross floor areaGeneral forumsposted by Tristan Roberts on Dec 28, 2010, 6:19 pmNo, I don't think you need to include this, just as you wouldn't include an outdoor parking lot. It's not occupied space. Application for LEED cetification ... |
|
required documentationCS-2009 EAc3: Enhanced Commissioningposted by Tatjana Ernst on Dec 10, 2010, 4:24 amwe have an CS-Building with an DES-System. we want to submit CS-Certification in March 2011 the owner will transfer the Core and Shell building in March 2011 but all lot of technical devices will be install in the tenant construction phase. Also the DES-System will be only finished after March 2011 and the Comissioning Phase for the system will be in Juli 2011. So do i understand it right that it is ok... Last reply: Chris Ladner, Dec 28, 2010, 5:47 pm |
|
Steel Recycling Institute's averages for recycled content steelNC-2009 MRc4: Recycled Contentposted by Linda Davisson on Dec 21, 2010, 1:22 pmon 1/13/2003, ruling on 2/4/2003). Our friends at Fore-Solutions who consult on a lot of LEED projects say that they intend to continue invoking this rule in LEED 2009, even though, as you say, it isn't... Last reply: Nadav Malin, Dec 23, 2010, 9:17 am |
|
sacred cowsGeneral forumsposted by Bill Swanson on Nov 29, 2010, 3:46 pmMember 1297 thumbs up December 22, 2010- 7:46 am I haven't read the new draft yet, but what Bill was mentioning above does sound a lot like the USGBC finally does make their requirements more independent from third party systems. I work a lot on no US based projects and I'm all for this kind of change. Because third party ratings systems, which are for the most part US-systems, put a big burden... Last reply: Susann Geithner, Dec 22, 2010, 7:46 am |
|
FTE for LEEDv3 NC applied on a hospitalCalculating FTEsposted by Veronika Sundberg on Dec 20, 2010, 6:47 amto post comments Veronika Sundberg Environmental Engineer- Certification Skanska Sverige AB LEEDuser Basic Member 120 thumbs up December 21, 2010- 2:25 am Thanks a lot for your quick reply, but I do still... Last reply: Susan Walter, Dec 21, 2010, 5:20 pm |
|
What plants constitute the baseline under Option 1CS-2009 WEc1: Water Efficient Landscapingposted by Deborah Lucking on Oct 6, 2010, 2:57 pmTristan Roberts Representative Vermont House of Representatives LEEDuser Expert 11477 thumbs up October 8, 2010- 10:51 am The baseline case is supposed to represent conventional landscaping choices for the region, according to the LEED Reference Guide.A non-native plant could be part of the baseline if it's conventionally used there in landscaping. Log in or register to post comments Gabriela Hernández Castillo Architect, LEED AP BD+C SYASA- México LEEDuser Basic Member 201 thumbs up December 21, 2010- 1:06 am We have a project that is a zero lot line and because of the shape of the building... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Dec 21, 2010, 7:57 am |
|
Pin-based CFL'sEBOM-2009 MRc4: Sustainable purchasing - reduced mercury in lampsposted by Drew Johnson on Dec 28, 2009, 12:21 pmJenny Carney Vice President WSP LEEDuser Expert 657 thumbs up December 29, 2009- 11:59 am I'm not sure if there's been any consideration of offering a similar approach to pin-based CFLs, but I think the main motivation for the screw-based allowance is to make sure this credit doesn't discourage a switch from incandescents to screw-based CFLs. Since that possibility doesn't exist for the pin-based lamps, there's no special allowance. If you do happen to have a lot of pin-based CFLs that are pushing your picogram/lumen hour value up, you can always exclude up to 10% of lamps from... Last reply: Richard Navarro, Dec 20, 2010, 5:02 pm |