Log in

4027 search results for "zero lot line"

Forum
Topic

Janitor's Sinks

EBOM-2009 WEp1: Minimum Indoor Plumbing Fixture and Fitting Efficiency
posted by Dianne Herrin on May 13, 2010, 2:40 pm

thumbs up January 20, 2011- 11:51 pm Kitchen sinks are included—they are used for a lot more than pot filling. If you have a specific pot filling sink I could see excluding that, though. Log in or register...

Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Jan 20, 2011, 11:51 pm

Accounting for Process *Materials*

EBOM-2009 MRc1: Sustainable purchasing - ongoing consumables
posted by Coleen Collins on Jan 12, 2011, 11:12 pm

Tristan Roberts Representative Vermont House of Representatives LEEDuser Expert 11477 thumbs up January 20, 2011- 11:35 pm Kevin, see the example in the discussion above about an aquarium.Also, this discussion on purchases made within the building but not for the building.Keep in mind that these credits are intended to be fairly inclusive—food for example is not about the "operation" of a building but has a lot to do with the impact of its activities.With your examples, I would count the tack cloths and lab materials but not the wood purchases. Log in or register to post comments ...

Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Jan 20, 2011, 11:35 pm

Draft forms

General forums
posted by Susan Walter on Jan 20, 2011, 3:18 pm

to the extent that the original building line is obliterated. How do you define a building then? Smoke compartment? Original footprint? Mechanical zones? By departments? To date, we've been very conservative...

MR Materials Credits (recycled/reuse/regional/biobased)

General forums
posted by Tom Lent on Jan 10, 2011, 8:39 pm

a prerequisite for recycled material. From the on line webinar it was discussed that the Recycled Content points are always being achieved, the market has transformed itself which is good. So just raise...

Last reply: Laura S. D'Ardenne, Jan 19, 2011, 8:01 pm

"Period of Manufacture"

CI-2009 IEQc4.5: Low-emitting materials - systems furniture and seating
posted by Susann Geithner on Oct 26, 2010, 9:40 am

Sparandara Sustainability Manager Google LEEDuser Expert 997 thumbs up January 19, 2011- 2:17 pm Thanks for your very helpful comment Randy. That cleared up a lot for me.:) Log in or register to post comments ...

Last reply: Lauren Sparandara, Jan 19, 2011, 2:17 pm

pool and runoff coefficient

EBOM-2009 SSc6: Stormwater Quantity Control
posted by Pablo Fortunato Suarez on Jan 18, 2011, 6:05 am

Gregory Hurst Office Manager Robert Peccia & Associates LEEDuser Basic Member 66 thumbs up January 18, 2011- 11:10 am I consider a pool the same as a pond or lake. If the pool can contain the rainfall event with no discharge to the sanitary sewer, then the runoff coefficient is essentially zero. If, on the other hand, the rain that falls directly into the pool raises the water level sufficientl6y to overflow into the sanitary sewer, the runoff coefficient is 1.0. Many times the pool will have a bit of freeboard before the water level rises enough to overflow and this will allow you to capture...

Last reply: Gregory Hurst, Jan 18, 2011, 11:10 am

Pre-Approval Process

General forums
posted by Jeremy Poling on Jan 12, 2011, 10:21 am

Associate Thornton Tomasetti LEEDuser Premium Member 273 thumbs up January 12, 2011- 4:10 pm Randall--Who should I contact about this issue? I'd prefer not to continue this discussion on line. Log...

Last reply: Dave Intner, Jan 14, 2011, 3:57 am

Compliant Exterior lighting and security cameras

NC-2009 SSc8: Light Pollution Reduction
posted by Kelly Pimmel on Jan 13, 2011, 4:16 pm

in a parking lot. This is a game changer as this is much greater light than what the IES would require (typically we can go as low as.2 at the darkest point and we were shooting for an average of 1 fc) for general lighting levels for this type of parking lot and building. The engineers have done some quick calc's and are confident that the LEED credit for light pollution reduction (which requires us...

Bases of comparison

Pilot-Credits EApc3: Medical and process equipment efficiency
posted by Carolina Vergnano on Jan 11, 2011, 9:29 am

To attend the requirements of this PC it is necessary to compare the chosen equipment for the project with its similars. We are a little confused about what to compare: in the beginning the requirements states that we should use the rated power, although, some lines after, it says that we should compare the equipments based on their continuous mode electrical energy consumption (stand-by mode). Which of them (rated power or stand-by mode) should we use to compare the chosen equipment with their similar? Regards, Fabiano Ferreira / Juliana Malho Cushman & Wakefield EApc3 ...

Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jan 12, 2011, 4:39 pm

How Anonymous?

EBOM-2009 IEQc2.1: Occupant comfort - occupant survey
posted by Tim Ward on Jan 12, 2011, 2:20 pm

We conducted an on-line occupant survey that generated 444 replies (30.8% of FTE). We acheived this rate by offering to put the respondent's name into a drawing for a $100 gift certificate. The GBCI review team rejected our documentation for this credit since they weren't "anonymous" and wants us to perform a revised survey. It is extremely unlikely we will achieve the 30% threshold without this "prize". Any ideas on how we can move forward? IEQc2.1 ...

Last reply: Dan Ackerstein, Jan 12, 2011, 2:47 pm