Log in

LEED

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

FTE's for Convention Center

Forum discussion

Calculating FTEs

FTE's for Convention Center

July 7, 2012

Has anyone calculated FTE's for a Convention Center. I have been working on this credit and am still not comfortable with my numbers. I have calculated dark days, move in-move out days, and Event days with staff and guests. This is the way two other teams have calculated this on other projects but it seems distorted to me.

Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

When to Use the AGMBC and is it required?

Forum discussion

LEED Guidance for Campuses and Multiple Buildings

When to Use the AGMBC and is it required?

July 5, 2012

I am working on a project that consists of 4 buildings. 2 of them are targeting certification and 2 of them are not (due to the fact that they would not meet MPRs). The two buildings targeting certification are currently registered separately on LEED Online. (NC 2009). The majority of design side credits have already been documented. The established LEED project boundary for these two projects is a bit arbitrary as in reality they share site amenities such as storm water collection, parking, etc. Is there any advantage to going back and attempting to use the AGMBC for certification? It seems to me that if a review team looked at the site plan, it would be clear that the LEED Project Boundary doesn't make sense.

As part two of the question...is there any requirement to use the AGMBC in this type of situation? I've e-mailed and called GBCI with no clarity of answer. Please help!!!

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Revising Contractor LEED documentation (v2.2 project)

Forum discussion

LEED Reviews: Appeals, Design/Construction Submittals, and more

Revising Contractor LEED documentation (v2.2 project)

June 29, 2012

We are reviewing a project for LEED certification (v 2.2) that was designed and constructed by another firm. There are documentation and template form issues with the Recycled content/Regional credits-we are trying to figure out the best way to correct the errors since the contractor is no longer in the picture and we probably can't get them to revise their information.
Is possible for us to 'redo' the contractor forms ourselves? We have access to the submittal and cost information and can get additional documentation info from the manufacturer. The contractor''s LEED consultant signed all their forms so we are hoping it wont an issue if our names are on the form instead. If anyone has had any experience with this your thoughts on the issue would be appreciated.
Thanks!

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

LEED Online Issues

Forum discussion

leedonline.com access - is it possible???

LEED Online Issues

June 28, 2012

Hello,
I read all the treads below and also followed the system requirement guidelines at LEED online.com. However my LEED online webpage on IE8 goes offline every now and then- "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage". I am sure my internet connection is very strong as other tabs on IE8 and Google Chrome work simultaneously and absolutely fine . I tried closing all the applications and using only LEED online on IE8. But no use. So I guess it must be the problem with LEED online only. It is really annoying. I had called GBCI customer service and I was told to give the feedback to their IT department. Has anyone facing the similar problem? Did you find any solution?

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Air-tight Drywall Approach/Compartmentalization &Sprinkler Heads

Forum discussion

LEED for Homes (LEED-H) Forum

Air-tight Drywall Approach/Compartmentalization &Sprinkler Heads

June 27, 2012

What are people doing out there for sealing quick-response sprinkler heads in mid-rise projects? I've been told that the gasket approach cannot be used with quick-response heads.

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

LEED “Certifiable” Specifications: 4 Approaches

In our experience with over 200 (real) LEED projects, we have seen four approaches.

Approach 1: Declare an early victory

The team completes the LEED scorecard and declares victory. There is no mention of LEED in the project manual and the contractor is asked to “make the right green choices.” There is no review of the scorecard after construction. While this is clearly a useless LEED approach, there are many who accept this result. In fairness, some are municipalities that are not able to mandate certification, others are architects who believe their professional training and personal commitment is the correct measure of sustainability.

Specifier’s Response:As always, at least include low-VOC products, high-performance products, and construction waste management in your specs.

Approach 2: Sprinkle in some requirements

The team completes the LEED scorecard, makes a determination of which design credits could be easily achieved, and includes only a few requirements in the specifications. Perhaps construction waste management, FSC-certified wood, and Green Label Plus carpet are sufficient to demonstrate some interest in sustainable design. Data-intensive credits such as recycled content, regional materials, and low-emitting materials are typically avoided. Again, the scorecard is not evaluated after construction.

Specifier’s Response: Match the specs with the LEED credits selected. Include submittals at the level of detail that a LEED audit would require, such as chain-of-custody (CoC) documentation for FSC products and VOC levels for paints, coatings, sealants, and adhesives.

Approach 3: Everything but submitting for LEED review

The team completes the LEED scorecard, includes it and all relevant requirements in the project manual, and collects all the data from the contractor, but does not submit to GBCI for certification. The team makes an internal evaluation of whether the goal has been obtained, and declares success. This approach is frequently taken at colleges, where those that manage the projects need to respond to various faculty and student initiatives. There is some certainty that LEED Certification would have been achieved, but typically there is no energy model, no commissioning—generally, little attempt at any credit which involves increased expense.

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Specifier’s Response: Again, match the specs with the LEED credits selected. Note that the credit numbering and language for all the different LEED rating systems is slightly different—be sure which LEED program the team is following.

Approach 4: Go beyond LEED

The design team is actually committed to sustainability, and regrets the owner can’t or won’t fund LEED Certification. The energy model is developed early and really informs the design. Products that meet the VOC limits, regional goals, recycled content are specified into the project without reference to LEED. The contractor is asked to include sustainability in their product choices. The contingency fund for construction includes sustainability as a reason for a change order. After all, isn’t that what design is all about—understanding the owner’s requirements and delivering the best result for the funds available?

Specifier’s Response: Same as Approach 3 above, but now there’s the opportunity to go beyond LEED requirements. Make sure environmentally committed firms like Interface and Kingspan have an opportunity to bid. Ask the project owner what their standard products are, to help minimize waste in the future. Look downstream and make sure the NFPA fire door inspections are actually done and documented.

Also read Six Things LEED Consultants Do Wrong in Specs, by Mark Kalin—and join the discussion there.

Mark Kalin is President of Kalin Associates Specifications and currently Chair of CSI’s National Technical Committee. The firm has completed specs for over 200 LEED projects. Free spec downloads and position papers at www.kalinassociates.com. Check out GreenSpec for guidance on more sustainable building products to include in your project specifications.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Pursuing additional credits after final certification review

Forum discussion

LEED Reviews: Appeals, Design/Construction Submittals, and more

Pursuing additional credits after final certification review

June 25, 2012

We have a project that has received final design and construction review. The project has fallen short of the threshold for Silver. What is the method to pursue additional credits? Do we have to add credits via appeal or can the credits be pursued during the 25 day window to accept certification review?

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Calculating extent of 'Previously Developed Sites'

Forum discussion

General forums

Calculating extent of 'Previously Developed Sites'

June 22, 2012

Hi Leeders,

Option 1a for Infill Site determination stipulates the following:

"At least 75% of [the project site] boundary borders parcels that individually are at least 50% previously developed, and that in aggregate are at least 75% previously developed."

How does one calculate to what extent a bordering parcel is previously developed?

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

GSF for Master Site?

Forum discussion

LEED Guidance for Campuses and Multiple Buildings

GSF for Master Site?

June 21, 2012

I have a new campus project where two of the seven buildings are getting certified. So, we have a Master Site registered and two individual building registrations. In the Master Site PI form 2, under total gross square footage, should we enter the GSF of only the buildings being certified, or of all the buildings being constructed on the campus?

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Construction Impact Zone

Forum discussion

General forums

Construction Impact Zone

June 20, 2012

Hello LEED User ND forum,

I am preparing my Stage 1 LEED ND project for the SLL Prerequisite Review. In doing so, I noticed that Project Information From (PIF) 3 requires a map specifying the construction impact zone. This zone is described pretty clearly in the definitions in the LEED ND Reference Guide. However, I'm having trouble finding any specific ND requirements that refer back to the construction impact zone.

So, my questions are the following:

1. What, if any, are the requirements for the construction impact zone? Do these requirements go beyond 'stay out of any wetlands, water bodies, or areas with imperiled species and ecological communities'?

2. At this early stage in my project, I cannot know very precisely what the construction impact zone will be. Because this is a greenfield project and it involves a lot of landscape restoration and park development, the impact zone is likely to go a far beyond the development footprint. The safest assumption, although clearly an overestimation, is that nearly everywhere will at some point be subject to some work, even if that is just digging and planting. Is there any reason to think this would be a problem with regards to LEED ND, so long as areas protected by LEED ND prerequisites are kept out of the impact zone and no work happens within them?

Thanks again,

Daniel

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for  »

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.