Topic | Recent |
---|---|
Written commitment for Ergonomics program clarificationPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Kristen Magnuson on Jul 13, 2018, 7:06 pm
I have a question about the following requirement for this pilot credit:
|
|
Ergonomic Strategy- 75% ergonomic workstationsPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Lisa Marshall on Apr 9, 2014, 5:50 pm
I recently had a reviewer request a compliance calculation confirming that at least 75% of the tenant occupants have an ergonomic workstation. I do not see this listed anywhere as a requirement... Last reply: Heather Dalton, Feb 1, 2018, 5:02 pm |
|
Health and Safety SpecialistPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Marissa Hebert on Nov 30, 2016, 12:26 pm
The credit requirements state that the team should "Engage an Ergonomist or Health and Safety Specialist". What is a Health and Safety Specialist? Is this someone with Ergonomics training? Do... Last reply: Ian Merker AIA, LEED AP BD+C, Dec 28, 2016, 4:51 pm |
|
Ergonomist Design Phase InvolvementPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Marissa Hebert on Dec 6, 2016, 6:40 pm
This may be an obvious answer, but it seems a little vague to me. The credit contains the following language: During the conceptual or schematic design phases: |
|
Will Sit/Stand desks become standard?Pilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Ron Finney on Jul 5, 2016, 3:00 pm
Have your clients begun asking for this to become their new standard? I haven't seen this yet but we are starting to use them more and more. frequently. Last reply: Michael Bodelson, Oct 12, 2016, 4:10 pm |
|
Ergonomics Criteria FeedbackPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Erin Ezell on May 13, 2016, 11:29 am
After applying PC44 on a recent project and seeing the subsequent 2016 updates to the pilot credit language, I wanted to share some feedback. Working with the previous "Ergonomics... |
|
Documenting the Pilot Credit with International StandardsPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Cesar Ruiz on Apr 14, 2016, 8:38 am
My project is located in Colombia and I had some trouble finding information about the possibility of using Standards from outside the US in the documentation of the Pilot Credit 44: Ergonomics... Last reply: Larissa Oaks, Apr 15, 2016, 4:50 pm |
|
Participate in LEEDuser Pilot Credit ForumPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Henry Mak on Jan 21, 2016, 8:04 am
Hi everyone, I have a silly question. For the evidence of participating in LEEDuser Pilot Credit Forum, what document could show this action? Do I have to post comment here and provide... Last reply: Batya Metalitz, Jan 21, 2016, 9:46 am |
|
Credit requirement languagePilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Ben Campbell on Jan 13, 2016, 9:18 pm
Has anyone else experienced that the pilot credit requirement language is vague in spots? Namely, the fact that 2 education sessions are required, and a follow-up survey, is not covered or... |
|
LEED Ergonomic CreditPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Katie Cervenec on Mar 30, 2015, 2:41 pm
Does anyone have any tips for getting the building occupants excited about participating in the ergonomic credit and learning about their new ergonomic features in their building? Last reply: Kena David , Dec 30, 2015, 5:45 pm |