4026 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
Power Purchasing Agreement (PPA) in lieu of RECNC-2009 EAc6: Green Powerposted by Jamison Hill on Jun 26, 2014, 6:44 pmand does look good for PR. Log in or register to post comments Kathryn West LEED AP BD+C, O+M, Green Globes Professional JLL LEEDuser Basic Member 154 thumbs up June 27, 2014- 10:50 am yeah, a lot of owners... Last reply: Kathryn West, Jun 27, 2014, 10:50 am |
|
Rational MethodCS-2009 SSc6.1: Stormwater design - quantity controlposted by MKK LEED on Jul 7, 2014, 10:01 amGood Morning, I’m starting with calculations in SS credit 6.1. But I have a question: Can I use the runoff data of the watershed where is located the project? Because in my understanding I must use Rational Method just for calculate the runoff in a watershed but not in a square site. The lot area is 47.762 m2 and the watershed where is located the project is in Bogotá city. Thank you very much. SSc6.1 ... Last reply: MKK LEED, Jul 9, 2014, 9:48 am |
|
Combining Option 2 and Option 3NC-2009 SSc4.1: Alternative transportation - public transportation accessposted by Meghan Ward on Jul 17, 2014, 6:04 amFor Option 2 the criteria is locating the project close to stop/s for 2 or more public, campus or private bus lines. For Option 3 the criteria is locating the project close to stops/s for 2 or more existing rideshare options. For our project we only have one public bus line and then one rideshare option. Would we then be able to achieve this credit based on the project having two public transportation access?... Last reply: Meghan Ward, Jul 29, 2014, 10:18 am |
|
Extra PV, how to get credit?CI-2009 SSc1: Site Selectionposted by Keelan Kaiser on Jul 22, 2014, 11:10 amWe have a unique situation where we have an owner who wants to install a lot of pv on their project. SSc1 is already filled up with the max 5 points. Is there any way the additional PV can count as on-site renewable far exceeding this particular credit? Can we pursue an ID credit for this? Thanks. SSc1 ... Last reply: Keelan Kaiser, Jul 22, 2014, 1:13 pm |
|
Alternative Compliance Path: CS 2009 EAp2/EAc1NC-2009 EAc1: Optimize Energy Performanceposted by Jek Villarba on Jul 30, 2014, 6:20 amMarcus Sheffer LEED Fellow 7group / Energy Opportunities LEEDuser Expert 5903 thumbs up July 30, 2014- 9:29 am Enter the number of points you are pursuing even if the percentages do not line up. Then upload the spreadsheet with an explanation for how you determined the owner controlled/influenced percentage. The reviewer will make sure that the appropriate number of point are awarded. Log in or register to post comments Jek Villarba LEEDuser Basic Member July 30, 2014- 1:12 pm Marcus, thanks for your assistance. Not quite sure where I enter the number of points. Are you just talking about... Last reply: Jek Villarba, Jul 30, 2014, 1:41 pm |
|
Contract through Design Team- conflicting informationNC-2009 EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systemsposted by Rory Cousino on Aug 22, 2014, 9:51 amJorge Torres-Coto Building Systems Commissioning Engineer Empirical Engineering, LLC LEEDuser Basic Member 17 thumbs up August 22, 2014- 11:45 am We have been employed through various entities on projects (owner, design firm, even contractor). To avoid any confusion we do a small write up with the entities involved (CxA firm, Owner, and holder of CxA contract) and have all of them sign the document stating that for contractual simplicity X company subcontracted the CxA firm, but that the "direct line of communication" is between the CxA firm and the Owner. This has worked with the GBCI... Last reply: Scott Bowman, Oct 4, 2016, 5:16 pm |
|
Change of Fundamental Commissioning AgentNC-2009 EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systemsposted by Ilana Judah on Sep 16, 2014, 9:28 amin or register to post comments Scott Bowman LEED Fellow Integrated Design + Energy Advisors, LLC LEEDuser Expert 519 thumbs up October 8, 2014- 12:40 pm Yes Susan, there can be lots of reasons to have two firms (KJWW has been in that role on both sides if the relationship), and careful delineation of that oversight and review role is important. And thank you, knowing so many LEED Fellows, I have a lot to live up... Last reply: Craig Graber, Nov 11, 2022, 11:01 am |
|
Local Jurisdiction Approval?NC-2009 IEQp1: Minimum indoor air quality performanceposted by Marina Andrade on Sep 18, 2014, 7:22 amSeptember 18, 2014- 1:34 pm Ok! Now i know how to prove this. This helped a lot. Thanks Hernando! Log in or register to post comments ... Last reply: Marina Andrade, Sep 18, 2014, 1:34 pm |
|
Baseline envelope- Existing Buildings (Retrofit)NC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by João Costa on Oct 9, 2014, 10:11 amWaleed AlGhamdi Sustainability Enabler Eskew+Dumez+Ripple LEEDuser Basic Member 20 thumbs up July 15, 2019- 5:34 pm From the User Manual (which I recommend having since it explains a lot of things... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jul 16, 2019, 4:53 pm |
|
School with unusually large amount of artificial turfSchools-2009 SSc5.2: Site development - maximize open spaceposted by Helen Kessler on Oct 12, 2014, 9:16 pmTristan Roberts Representative Vermont House of Representatives LEEDuser Expert 11477 thumbs up November 24, 2015- 3:14 pm Helen, are you basically asking if the playing fields can be excluded from open space calculations? I don't think so, either in terms of an official exception or in terms of the LEED intent, which asks you to have open space that is also vegetated. Log in or register to post comments Helen Kessler President HJKessler Associates LEEDuser Premium Member 51 thumbs up November 24, 2015- 4:56 pm Hi Tristan, I received a response for this from GBCI. Bottom line- the entire... Last reply: Helen Kessler, Nov 24, 2015, 9:40 pm |