4028 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
Having problems with IEQp1EBOM-2009 IEQp1: Minimum indoor air quality performanceposted by Ryan Gardner on Sep 11, 2013, 6:27 pmI imagine the corridors in question are general circulation corridors though, so that would be of no help. I'm not sure whether the 10 cfm per person method (with zero people in the corridor) would fly... Last reply: Andrew Tse, Apr 10, 2014, 3:49 pm |
|
Scrap material used to make different product in same facilityNC-2009 MRc4: Recycled Contentposted by Jay DeVilbiss on Sep 16, 2013, 1:38 pmHi, I have read the LEED requirements and comments regarding the exclusion of things like glass and aluminum scrap that are reincorporated into the same manufacturing process. However, I am unclear if this exception applies to a project I am currently working on. I am working with a client whose family owns and operates a granite countertop fabrication shop. The process currently generates a lot of scrap pieces... Last reply: Jay DeVilbiss, Sep 16, 2013, 4:17 pm |
|
Views: Exemplary Performance- Human ActivityNC-2009 IEQc8.2: Daylight and views - viewsposted by Greg Romanczyk on Sep 16, 2013, 3:57 pmTODD REED Energy Program Specialist PA DMVA LEEDuser Expert 888 thumbs up September 16, 2013- 4:26 pm People walking on a sidewalk is a human activity. Log in or register to post comments Greg Romanczyk EXP LEEDuser Premium Member 18 thumbs up September 16, 2013- 4:40 pm Thanks! Would the same be true for a view of a parking lot where people are getting out of their cars and walking towards a building? Even though this doesn't seem like the most glamorous view of human activity, based on your answer above I presume it will be 'yes'? Log in or register to post comments TODD REED... Last reply: TODD REED, Sep 17, 2013, 9:00 am |
|
All Spaces ExcludedSchools-2009 IEQc8.2: Daylight and views - viewsposted by Caleb Mactavish on Sep 24, 2013, 11:22 amoccupied spaces. Therefore, we have not provided views for "all other spaces". Basically, for EQc8.2 purposes, we have a building that has zero regularly occupied spaces and consequently... Last reply: TODD REED, Sep 24, 2013, 3:26 pm |
|
Humidity is out of Our Control, Can we still achieve credit?CI-2009 IEQc7.2: Thermal comfort - verificationposted by Krystle Thomsen on Sep 26, 2013, 2:02 pm28 thumbs up March 11, 2014- 2:07 pm I work on a lot of projects in California where humidity typically isn’t an issue and is rarely monitored. In the past we have been awarded this credit even... Last reply: Jennifer Wehling, Mar 11, 2014, 2:07 pm |
|
Group Project Grandfathered in as a single buildingLEED Guidance for Campuses and Multiple Buildingsposted by John McLean on Oct 3, 2013, 4:47 pmthe client has decided to go forward with the project. Are the three buildings connected in any way?. Are they all separately metered? I really don't hold out a lot of hope that you will get this project... Last reply: Barry Giles, Oct 9, 2013, 11:09 am |
|
ID credit: Aluminum form-work systemNC-2009 IDc1: Innovation in Designposted by Eric Carter on Oct 9, 2013, 2:30 pmnot qualify for an innovation point. The rule is that a comprehensive approach is required. See the guidance above. So for example, a comprehensive construction waste reduction strategy along the lines of LEED... Last reply: Eric Carter, Oct 10, 2013, 12:55 pm |
|
Baseline equal to zeroND-v2009 GIBp3: Minimum building water efficiencyposted by Karyn Rodrigues on Oct 10, 2013, 1:04 pmEliot Allen LEED AP-ND, Principal Criterion Planners LEEDuser Expert 303 thumbs up October 10, 2013- 4:41 pm Karyn, yes, it sounds like you've got it right. Assuming all the buildings are either non-residential, mixed-use, or multi-family residential four stories or more, the weighted average equals each building's percent water reduction multiplied by its percent of total floor area, then summed. For example, a hypothetical Bldg 1 of 10,000 sq ft with 30% water reduction, Bldg 2 of 5,000 sq ft with 20% reduction, and Bldg 3 of 5,000 sq ft with zero reduction, would have a weighted average... Last reply: Eliot Allen, Oct 10, 2013, 6:57 pm |
|
New parking on an existing campusNC-2009 SSc4.3: Alternative transportation - low-emitting and fuel-efficient vehiclesposted by Helen Kessler on Oct 17, 2013, 7:46 pmOur project is a new classroom building on an existing campus. The campus has a large existing parking lot which is adjacent to our project and which will serve the occupants of our building and other buildings on campus. It is not within our LEED project boundary. Our project will be adding 61 new parking spaces, which are within our LEED boundary. Our team plans to designate 4 preferred spaces for LEV/FEV parking as part of the additional parking that we are adding. We plan to ignore the existing parking lot. My question- are we meeting the intent since we are designating 5% of the new parking... Last reply: Ellen Mitchell, Oct 18, 2013, 9:54 am |
|
Fan power credit and packaged vavNC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by HOUCINE TLEMSANI on Oct 18, 2013, 3:36 pmI am working on a project where the base line system is a packaged VAV with reheat. ASHRAE 90.1 specify the packaged efficiency as 9.8 EER including the compressor heat rejection and fans. The question I am having is that if we are taking credit for the fan power pressure drops adjustment in the system in accordance with ASHRAE 90.1 are we allowed to change the packaged efficiency by including the fan credit allowance or no? EAp2 ... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Nov 1, 2013, 12:21 pm |