267 search results for "ISO 15118"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
Demand Response MeteringNC-v4 EAc4: Demand responseposted by Jordan Creveling on Apr 1, 2020, 5:42 pmIn the case of the Fully Automated Response Event Management, is the Meter that is shown providing feedback to the Utility/ISO/CSP suppose to be the Utility's Meter that comes with the Electrical Service? Or does a more advanced separate Tenant Metering system (in addition to the Utility Meter) need to be installed to report building Interval meter load information back to the Utility/ISO/CSP to view load data? In the case of the Semi Automated Response Event Management, is Interval metered feedback required by the utility at all? EAc4 ... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Oct 5, 2020, 2:29 pm |
|
EQc- Indoor Air Quality TestingRetail-CI-v4 EQc4: Indoor air quality assessmentposted by Roshni Lad on Sep 22, 2020, 1:57 pmof formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds must be accredited under ISO/IEC 17025 for the test methods. Hope it helps. Thanks! Log in or register to post comments ... Last reply: Bipin Karki, Sep 30, 2020, 3:23 pm |
|
Can a non-compliant industry-wide type III EPD be tracked as a product-specific EPD instead?NC-v4 MRc2: Building product disclosure and optimization - environmental product declarationsposted by Jenelle Shapiro on Mar 25, 2019, 4:39 pmto ISO 14044 and ISO 14025, but not EN 15804. In this case, I would think this counts as 1/4 EPD. Any thoughts? Log in or register to post comments Joanna Switzer Sustainability Project Manager Atkins... Last reply: antai ramos stevens, Sep 23, 2020, 7:46 pm |
|
ASHRAE vs. ISO/ENNC-2009 IEQc7.1: Thermal comfort - designposted by Jens Apel on Apr 3, 2014, 9:01 amserge sidoroff Director of Environmental projects Penicaud Green Building- edeis group LEEDuser Basic Member 1 thumbs up June 13, 2014- 8:18 am Yes, we did it successfully using the ISO 7730 Appendix E and justifying by complete thermal simulation that PMV was never out of the interval-.5, +.5 for all rooms and all occupancy conditions. Log in or register to post comments Audrey LEDESERT LEEDuser Basic Member 1 thumbs up September 2, 2020- 2:58 am @Serge Sidoroff Is it really necessary to make a complete thermal simulation or can we make such a simulation for only one part per type... Last reply: Audrey LEDESERT, Sep 2, 2020, 2:58 am |
|
Testing methods accepted for formaldehyde emissions evaluation outside United StatesNC-v4.1 EQc2: Low-emitting materialsposted by Miguel Broncano on Aug 26, 2020, 7:24 amV4.1 is clear: EN16516 is the test method to use. But in case of LEED V4.0, my question is if the test method used for testing formaldehyde emission could be ISO16000-6, instead of EN16516. As you probably know, ISO 16000-6 is the method used for A+ French label. Thank you in advance for your help. Best Regards EQc2 ... |
|
Ergonomic StandardsPilot-Credits EQpc44: Ergonomics approach for computer usersposted by Brenda Parker on Nov 16, 2016, 1:42 pmIs there a website to view the ergonomic standards for workstations (BIFMA G1-2013, ANSI/HFES 100-2007, CSA Z412-00, ISO 9241-5:1998) without paying a fee? EQpc44 United States ... Last reply: Annalise Dum, Aug 11, 2020, 12:03 pm |
|
changes within v4.1 requirementsNC-v4.1 LTc8: Electric Vehiclesposted by emily reese moody on Jul 29, 2020, 11:15 amEmily Purcell Sustainable Design Lead CannonDesign LEEDuser Expert 369 thumbs up July 29, 2020- 11:36 am Discussed this earlier here: https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/forum/evse-iso-15118-compliance Looking back, my last comment was abut the credit library not showing the newest requirement, but now it is consistent with the 1/2020 addenda. So I guess we can chalk that up to a credit iibrary redesign issue. Log in or register to post comments emily reese moody Sustainability Director, Certifications & Compliance Jacobs LEEDuser Expert 475 thumbs up July 29, 2020- 11:55 am Ooh, thanks. Very... Last reply: emily reese moody, Jul 29, 2020, 11:55 am |
|
Any reason NOT to switch from v4 to v4.1 for the BPDO EPD credit?NC-v4 MRc2: Building product disclosure and optimization - environmental product declarationsposted by Renee Shirey on Jul 12, 2019, 9:59 amand are hoping to claim 1.5 for EPDs meeting the definition of Product-specific Type III EPD "which conform to ISO 14025 and EN 15804 or ISO 21930 and have at least a cradle to gate scope." I agree... Last reply: Summer Minchew, Jul 23, 2020, 3:34 pm |
|
Duct sealants and wallpaper emissions testingCI-v4 EQc2: Low-emitting materialsposted by Kathleen Gaffney on Mar 25, 2020, 2:54 pmranges: 0.5 mg/m3 or less, between 0.5 and 5 mg/m3, or 5 mg/m3 or more). Laboratories that conduct the tests must be accredited under ISO/IEC 17025 for the test methods they use. Products used in school... Last reply: Allen Cornett, Jun 5, 2020, 2:14 pm |
|
External Verification of EPDNC-v4 MRc2: Building product disclosure and optimization - environmental product declarationsposted by Hashir Usman on May 11, 2020, 6:52 amHi all, I would like to ask what is the difference between EPD Process Certification and EPD Verification? As I can see in an EPD certificate as "Quality audit for the declaration and the information in compliance with ISO 14025:2006 ■ EPD process certification □ EPD verification". It also has a third party verifier so does it comply with external verification and fall in Product-Specific Type III category? Thanks a lot. MRc2 ... Last reply: Hashir Usman, May 14, 2020, 11:05 am |