Log in
Forum
Topic

EVSE- ISO 15118 compliance

NC-v4.1 LTc8: Electric Vehicles
posted by Mike Cavanaugh on May 9, 2019, 6:30 pm

if a summary addenda document exists or not yet, and if so, where it is... If anybody on the Forum knows, let us know! Thanks! Log in or register to post comments Joseph Snider Principal Integrative...

Last reply: Emily Purcell, Jan 29, 2020, 3:36 pm

v4.1 EPD Option 2 (optimization)- no viable way to mandate this in construction specs!

NC-v4.1 MRc2: Environmental Product Declarations
posted by Joanna Switzer on Apr 17, 2020, 2:38 pm

July 17, 2023- 3:43 pm On this forum it was recently brought to our attention that the format that the Allegion optimized EPD reports no longer met the requirements of USGBC. We worked with our...

Last reply: Lauren Richardson, Jan 29, 2024, 10:14 am

Commingled waste as one or multiple material streams?

NC-v4 MRc5: Construction and demolition waste management
posted by Janika McFeely on Jan 9, 2015, 6:15 pm

the information contained in the Bird's Eye View for this forum that provides answers to some of your questions and provides additional tips to achieve this credit. If you can provide specific recycling...

Last reply: riiupw epics, Dec 5, 2020, 4:48 am

Structural Steel Backup Letters

NC-v4 MRc3: Building product disclosure and optimization - sourcing of raw materials
posted by Michelle Rosenberger on Aug 19, 2019, 12:57 pm

documentation that clarifies why the mill-specific percentages they are reporting can be considered "product-specific" in an attempt to salvage the credit. I will plan to update this forum about...

Last reply: Nash Emrich, Sep 9, 2021, 2:31 pm

November Surprise?

NC-v4.1 MRc5: Construction and demolition waste management
posted by Jonathan Weiss on Nov 24, 2020, 3:41 pm

I am hoping I read this wrong, but the current version of the credit on USGBC.org and the Addendum posting (as of early November) seems to have changed this credit significantly - Option 1 is 1...

Last reply: Chloe Bendistis, Sep 1, 2021, 12:53 pm

MR4-vs- MR7 credits

NC-2009 MRc7: Certified Wood
posted by Esther Kohout on Jul 30, 2014, 2:38 pm

have been ignored, as have the email our current COC certifying body has sent. However this forum is quite helpful all of your comments confirmed for me that we should just submit what we know...

Last reply: Jason Grant, Feb 17, 2015, 2:15 pm

Unisex Toilet

NC-2009 WEp1: Water Use Reduction
posted by sebastian castañeda on Jun 17, 2016, 12:01 pm

Lead CannonDesign LEEDuser Expert 318 thumbs up May 6, 2020- 6:42 pm Hi Edgar, I just realized this is the v2009 forum and I was looking at the v4 water calculator. Apologies for the mix-up. It still...

Last reply: Emily Purcell, May 7, 2020, 3:52 pm

Wet Applied Products Volume

NC-v4 EQc2: Low-emitting materials
posted by Tommy Linstroth on Aug 21, 2015, 2:01 pm

The calculator USGBC provides for this credit make it appear that the volume is required for ALL products, regardless of if you are doing a budget or if projects all meet...

Last reply: Erin Holdenried, Apr 9, 2018, 8:04 pm

Any success with this credit yet?

Pilot-Credits INpc113: Informing Design Using Triple Bottom Line Analysis
posted by Sophie Kerr on Oct 29, 2018, 4:11 pm

it was some how communicated to the reviewer or linked to the project. 3. Confirmation that a project member has participated in the LEED user pilot credit forum- There are only a few of us who have commented on this in the LEED User forum so my guess is not many have used this pilot credit it or it's been approved for others without participating in the forum. Log in or register to post comments Elaine Goetz Ohio University LEEDuser Basic Member July 15, 2019- 3:06 pm We also completed this credit using Autocase, but have not yet submitted it.  Participating in the LEED user pilot credit forum (this posting) is one...

Last reply: Rachael Johnson, Mar 20, 2023, 1:05 pm

What should USGBC do with the extra time to ensure success?

General forums
posted by Nadav Malin on Jun 4, 2012, 10:31 pm

I'm concerned that there are so many stakeholders with so many competing agendas that the extra time could be lost sorting through the differences and trying to appease everyone. I like the beta...

Last reply: Larry Sims, Jun 14, 2012, 9:53 am