Forum quick links
Option 2 Optimization - from what?
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Margaret Montgomery on
I think, perhaps foolishly, that we may have some products that can meet this requirement, but can only move forward if I can answer two key questions:
Multiple EPDs for the same material
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Ricardo Sá on
Dear All,
Why materials cost in calculator (counting 20 products)?
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Maria Porter on
Dear all,
Expiration of EPDs- Registration or Submission?
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Samantha Lee on
Hello all,
"20 Different permanently installed products"
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by James Keohane on
Question about how to apply the requirement for "20 different pemanently installed products"? Can I for example use more than one paint type from Sherwin Williams? Pushing the thought f
V4.2 EPD Option 2 example
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Sue Bryant on
Does anyone have examples of material documentation to meet Option 2? Thanks!
Definition of product distribution, and final manufacturing and documentation
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Allison Para on
Working for a architectural building product manufacturer in Sustainable Design Office.
Does anyone know if exemplary performance points are still available in V4.1
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by James Howarth on
Our project is currently registered in V4 and considering opting in to V4.1 for the Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations credit.
MRc2 Building Product Disclose and Optimization - Compliance Clarification
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by RDK E&S on
Hello,
Products with a critically reviewed LCA
NC-v4.1 MRc2:Environmental Product Declarationsposted by Maggie Wildnauer on
From reading the wording on the first option, for a critically reviewed LCA, it doesn't appear that a company needs to be explicitly recognized as a participant in the LCA - is this true?