4027 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
New Parking?NC-2009 SSc4.4: Alternative transportation - parking capacityposted by Aaron Summers on Jul 30, 2010, 12:38 pmline. However it is still with the scope work limit line boundary. Log in or register to post comments Larry Jones Associate Director Atelier Ten LEEDuser Basic Member 258 thumbs up August 4, 2010- 8:15 am Aaron, I would be mindful of how you document your credits, including the site plan that you present for the general narrative. Even though the parking lot is outside the property line you state that it's within the same scope of work (and budget?) as the rest of your project. My sense is that you would have to include your parking lot in the LEED boundary. You didn't mention if this was v2.2... Last reply: Larry Jones, Aug 4, 2010, 8:15 am |
|
Fruits & Vegetables?NC-2009 SSc5.1: Site development - protect or restore habitatposted by Nelina Loiselle on Aug 10, 2010, 12:12 pmto attract biodiversity. Also, it is considered that gardening practices will be organic. We are in a zero lot line project, high density area, in a city where 99% of built areas are low density. Do you think... Last reply: Nadia Ayala, Aug 31, 2014, 2:05 pm |
|
Controllability of SystemsCI-2009 IEQc6.2: Controllability of systems - thermal comfortposted by Chris Hellstern on Aug 11, 2010, 4:39 pmas "thermafusers") so that the number of VAVs plus controllable grills is equal to half the number of occupants. This is not a common approach, but we have tried it with small projects that have a lot of meeting rooms... Last reply: John Bauer, Aug 17, 2010, 10:49 pm |
|
open space requirementNC-2009 SSc5.2: Site development - maximize open spaceposted by Matthew VanSweden on Aug 19, 2010, 11:50 amscenarios would comply with SSc5.2 Case 1: 1. Assume the "open space requirement" is based on max lot coverage, which is 50% of the site. If the site is, say, 10,000 sf, then to meet the credit... Last reply: David Posada, Aug 20, 2010, 2:25 pm |
|
Re: Project SummaryGeneral forumsposted by David Posada on Aug 20, 2010, 12:22 pmOn the review team, there's likely to be different people reviewing different credits, based on their area of expertise. The summary narrative helps those different players understand the big picture of the project and can often prevent a lot of misunderstanding and mis-interpretation of your credit strategies. If you imagine what key information will help a specialist diving into a few specific credits understand the relevant context they'll need to understand your submission, that's what you want to aim for. As far as the numbers, provide your best guess if you have one, or leave some... Last reply: Breana Detzler, Apr 28, 2011, 10:50 am |
|
Baseline case: No Baseboard Radiators?NC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Jean Marais on Aug 24, 2010, 11:43 ama lot of hot air here. Log in or register to post comments ... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Aug 29, 2010, 5:42 pm |
|
Green roof insulation valueNC-2009 EAc1: Optimize Energy Performanceposted by Emmanuel Pauwels on Aug 26, 2010, 8:07 amMara Baum Partner, Architecture & Sustainability DIALOG LEEDuser Premium Member 674 thumbs up August 30, 2010- 7:35 pm Energy modeling of green roofs is pretty complicated business. A lot of the conventional energy saving strategies for roofs-- e.g. insulation values-- don't adequately address the real energy benefits of the green roof. In other words, it's not really about insulation.... Last reply: Mara Baum, Sep 8, 2010, 12:17 pm |
|
re: Performance PeriodPerformance Periodposted by Jason Franken on Aug 30, 2010, 5:15 pmThey all require performance period start & finish dates on the submittal sheet. So what do we put if all the performance periods are meant to line up during the 30-day shared window? Do we have to re-do all our surveys in the final month or these items are exempt from that 30-day window? Or is the performance period from the day we do the survey to the final day of the performance period to line up... Last reply: Melissa Merryweather, Oct 31, 2011, 2:16 am |
|
Retention Pond = zero potable water usage?EBOM-2009 WEc3: Water Efficient Landscapingposted by Paul C on Sep 13, 2010, 3:11 pmDan Ackerstein Principal Ackerstein Sustainability, LLC LEEDuser Expert 819 thumbs up September 15, 2010- 2:11 pm That sounds a lot like a rainwater retention system to me Paul. You're taking rainwater that otherwise would have run off your property into the storm sewer, storing it, and then using it in lieu of potable water to irrigate the property. If that is your sole source of irrigation... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Oct 15, 2010, 4:51 pm |
|
2010 SF Reduced Risk Pesticde ListEBOM-2009 IEQc3.6: Green cleaning - indoor integrated pest managementposted by Andy Rhoades on Sep 14, 2010, 3:00 pmJenny Carney Vice President WSP LEEDuser Expert 657 thumbs up September 14, 2010- 3:17 pm Andy, There's a Reference Guide addenda that directs project teams to the SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List: http://www.sfenvironment.org/our_programs/interests.html?ssi=2&ti=1&ii=117 It's my understanding that this is more comprehensive than the Reduced Risk Pesticide lists (regardless of issue date). Also, the Pesticide Hazard Screening List includes Tier 1 and 2 products in addition to Tier 3, so make sure you are zeroing in on the right Tier. Log in or register to post comments Pablo... Last reply: Jason Franken, May 16, 2011, 6:02 pm |