4026 search results for "zero lot line"
Topic | Recent |
---|---|
42" line of sightNC-2009 IEQc8.2: Daylight and views - viewsposted by Rebecca Molldrem on Apr 28, 2010, 10:22 ambetween 30” and 90” and the access to views at seated height, assumed to be 42" for desk work. The intent is to provide a straight line of view from seated position. The project can try submitting the credit showing the unobstructed line of sight going up to the window at 54". Some projects have come across that situation and got the credit approved with a narrative. Log in or register to post... Last reply: Susan M. Kaplan, Aug 1, 2012, 4:05 pm |
|
Reused furniture works against you for MRc4?CI-2009 MRc3.2: Materials reuse - furniture and furnishingsposted by Lauren Sparandara on Aug 24, 2010, 5:04 pmthere is a lot of work to be done on the cost credit forms MRc3,4,5,6, & 7. The interface is very clunk and laborious. Log in or register to post comments Susie Spivey-Tilson LEED Fellow, Senior Program... Last reply: Dave Intner, Nov 14, 2010, 1:03 pm |
|
Too much Window Area (WA)?Schools-2009 IEQc8.1: Daylight and views - daylightposted by Rebecca Griffith on Feb 22, 2011, 6:52 pmfrom your description it does sound like you have too much window area and quite a high VLT. In what way do you think that reducing your window area does not follow the purpose of the credit? A lot more... Last reply: TODD REED, Sep 21, 2011, 8:51 am |
|
FSC, assemblies and recent addendaNC-2009 MRc7: Certified Woodposted by Steve Loppnow on Mar 3, 2011, 5:11 pmthe attached link. http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=6392 On page 28 & 29 there is line item 397 that lays out how you do the calculations for FSC products. Notice the last part of that paragraph... Last reply: Judy Landwehr, Jul 21, 2011, 4:58 pm |
|
New PlaintiffsGeneral forumsposted by Ed Pieterick on Feb 8, 2011, 5:31 pmsavings. In fact, many LEED buildings use MORE energy than they would if they did not have LEED features. And they certainly cost a lot more, and there's not nearly enough acknowledgement... Last reply: JASON CHENARD, Feb 10, 2011, 7:57 am |
|
HVAC systems and equipment efficiencyNC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Guillermo T. Adamo on May 4, 2011, 5:43 pmreference for cooling mode, and above the reference value for heating mode. Can we still achive EAP1 using this HVAC systems? Thanks a lot, Willy Log in or register to post comments Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow... Last reply: CT G, May 5, 2015, 1:35 pm |
|
documenting uneven male/female occupancyNC-2009 WEp1: Water Use Reductionposted by Marni J Evans on Feb 22, 2012, 3:08 pmI can understand that GBCI wants us to confirm the true potential split and future split, because it is defending against project teams that are gaming the system- toilet rooms with urinals can save a lot... Last reply: Jonathan Weiss, May 14, 2012, 9:09 am |
|
4th comment period openGeneral forumsposted by Tristan Roberts on May 11, 2012, 1:23 pmBarry and all, I don’t doubt the value in the beta testing of this version. Absolutely essential…to LEED, USGBC, GBCI, the market, etc. There was a lot of learning way back when on the pilot for LEED 1,... Last reply: Barry Giles, May 15, 2012, 8:54 pm |
|
IEQp1 Review CommentsNC-2009 IEQp1: Minimum indoor air quality performanceposted by Marina Andrade on Oct 11, 2012, 1:29 pmof 0.8 is sometimes necessary. We've noted that a lot of recent reviews from GBCI result in the same set of comments, regardless of the actual design. GBCI wants the design team to validate... Last reply: Hernando Miranda, Oct 29, 2012, 6:14 pm |
|
Applicable version of water use reduction additional guidanceNC-2009 WEp1: Water Use Reductionposted by Tiffany Moore on Dec 27, 2012, 1:32 amguidance, addenda, rating systems, credit forms and LEED Interpretations, we have seen a continuing erosion of that boundary line of project registration date. How to keep up with the requirements... Last reply: Batya Metalitz, Jan 18, 2013, 4:25 pm |