Forum quick links
Batteries, mercury-containing lamps, and electronic waste
NC-v4 MRp1:Storage and collection of recyclablesposted by Maria Porter on
Chose to provide a recycling area for two of: batteries, mercury-containing lamps, and electronic waste.
All for Reuse Initiative
posted by Yarden Harari on
Hi All - I wanted to share out the All For Reuse initiative below by two peers in the sustainable materials management network. I know some SDL have already done much research on thi
Anyone else here concerned about LEED giving legitimacy to RECs through LEED Zero? I sure am.
posted by Brad Liljequist on
I have been watching LEED Zero for a while, and have appreciated certain things, but one thing I think is an absolute disaster is their allowance of mainline RECs for claiming Zero Energy and Zero
Time to Register for the Sustainable Design Leaders Summit!
posted by RoseAnn Grimes on
Hello Sustainable Design Leaders!
Here at BuildingGreen we are excited and looking forward to creating a valuable and engaging online summit with you all for 2020!
U.S. EPA TSCA Title VI ULEF Products
NC-v4 EQc2:Low emitting materialsposted by Marcia Weekes on
Our project is working with a wood door manufacturer that has indicated that they no longer use CARB ULEF labeling for their products, but can provide ULEF products that comply with the U.S.
v4.1 Calc: Omitting Cost/Area Inputs for 100%-Compliant Categories
NC-v4.1 EQc2:Low-Emitting Materialsposted by Lance Patrick Sy on
In the v4.1 Calculator, is it necessary to provide cost / surface area inputs for credit categories that are fully compliant?
90.1 2010 User's Manual versus the Standard
NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by Dave Hubka on
I assume the Standard must be followed when the User’s Manual contradicts it.
90.1 – 2010, Standard
Monitoring Device for IAQ
NC-v4 EQp1:Minimum indoor air quality performanceposted by Dang Thi on
Hi,