Forum quick links
v4, IDC, LEED Interpretation ID# 10419, 2013 Title 24 Part 6 California Energy Code - Existing envelope?
CI-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by Kevin Gilleran on
Hi,
Option 1 energy simulation - I am in review of the LEED Interpretation ID# 10419 and I am unclear how I model the existing envelope of a ID+C tenant space.
Other Legally Binding Documents to address Local Code in Tenant Spaces
CS-v4 EAc2:Optimize energy performanceposted by Teresa Stern on
Hi, I'm working on a CS project in WA state, which has an energy code more stringent than the ASHRAE baseline.
WELL v2 Emissions Requirements
posted by Patty Lloyd on
Hi, the WELL v2 Flooring Credit references CDPH Standard Method v1.2 2017- what labels is this equivalent to and from what dates? Working in numerous rating systems between LEED & WELL an
LEED Construction Submittals
posted by Kevin Doyle on
I have a Construction Submission question. Some Construction Submission credits require verification documentation.
Precipitation information
NC-v4 SSc4:Rainwater managementposted by Carmen Soraya Agudelo on
Hi,
I am not able to find the 10 years or more precipitation for a site in Alabama.
Can somebody has the NOAA link where I can get these precipitation data?
Walk-off Mat Needed at Service or Loading Dock Entries?
NC-v4 EQc1:Enhanced indoor air quality strategiesposted by Harry Flamm on
Is it required by your experience with LEED v4, that a building's back-of-house Service Entry or Loading Dock Entry to the building be outfitted with a walk-off mat? A LEED reviewer may
Simple Box energy model requirements
CI-v4 IPc1:Integrative processposted by Deborah Stadler on
What exactly is required to be submitted for documentation for the simple box model? We see the worksheet and narrative listed as required documentation for this credit. There is so muc
More Stringent Energy Codes
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Jason Cocek on
Does anyone know if there was a point where the IECC became more stringent than ASHRAE 90.1-2007 that is generally accepted by reviewers or is it always necessary to upload justification that the c