Forum quick links
Project Priorities & Innovation (IN) – Public Comment Draft, Page 59
posted by Dean Stanberry on
The term “Project Priorities” implies transactional activities. There is no recognition of operational activities.
Location and Transportation (LT) – Public Comment Draft, Page 10
posted by Dean Stanberry on
Granted a maximum of 10 points, this credit category is overweight, given that an existing building has no control over its location and minimal control over transportation alternatives.
Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) – Public Comment Draft, Page 45
posted by Dean Stanberry on
While the total of 20 points for this category is adequate, it is overweighted toward the Indoor Air Quality Performance and Occupant Satisfaction Survey.
Sustainable Sites (SS) – Public Comment Draft, Pages 14 & 8
posted by Dean Stanberry on
There are no basic concerns with the Sustainable Sites credit category, as the credit/points are all within the building sphere of control. The credit category may be underweighted at 2 points.
Materials and Resources (MR) – Public Comment Draft, Page 42
posted by Dean Stanberry on
This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies.
Materials and Resources (MR) – Public Comment Draft, Page 42
posted by Dean Stanberry on
This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies.
Water Efficiency (WE) – Public Comment Draft, Page 17
posted by Dean Stanberry on
From an operations perspective, we believe the Water, Energy, Waste, and IEQ credit categories should have a more balanced point allocation.
Existing Project with New Addition
NC-v4 SSc6:Light pollution reductionposted by Michelle Rosenberger on
We are adding a Natatorium addition to an existing YMCA. In conjunction with this work, there will be new exterior lighting installed.
Direct Reading tools for TVOC, Ozone, CO2 and CO is acceptable?
NC-v4.1 EQc4:Indoor Air Quality Assessmentposted by HONG MEE SONG on
Is direct reading tools are acceptable for getting the parameters of TVOC, Ozone, CO2 and CO if the reference test method is complied with the LEED requirement?
Map Software to Document Option 2 Diverse Uses
NC-v4 LTc4:Surrounding density and diverse usesposted by James Keohane on
I am looking for advice concerning map software used to most easily document location from project site and walking distance for each use. A mapquest screenshot for