Forum quick links
The overlap activities between CxA and CM Consultant
NC-2009 EAp1:Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systemsposted by Panupant Phapant on
Hi Can anyone share the CxA practice for LEED project in USA or other countries as we see that there are the overlap activities between the construction management consultant and CxA for LEED proje
Enhanced and Fundamental Comissioning
NC-v4 EAc1:Enhanced commissioningposted by Isabel Santos on
Dear all, Regarding the Commissioning Authority, if aiming to do Enhanced Commissioning, can the CxA be part of the LEED Consultant team, considering that the team has been involved in providing c
Rainwater Management
NC-v4 SSc4:Rainwater managementposted by Maria Glädt on
We are planning to follow option 2 (Natural Land Cover Conditions). The area consists mainly in clay with very low infiltration capacity.
WELL AP if you are LEED AP
posted by Maria Peralta on
Hi, I have seen on the web if you are LEED AP have discount to make the AP WELL . Is it true? I don't know how to recognize as LEED AP when making payment . Thank you
How to simulate qualified area for IEQc8.1 at both 9 am and 3pm
CS-2009 IEQc8.1:Daylight and Views—Daylightposted by Cathy W on
Option1-simulation. The result of ecotect shows the qualified regulary occupied area is 84% at 9 am, 83% at 3 pm.
shop applied adhesive in a laminate flooring
NC-2009 IEQc4.1:Low-Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealantsposted by Melissa Merryweather on
Our product uses a laminated flooring product. If the laminating adhesive and the finish product are both factory- applied, then do we need VOC tests?
High Rise Residential with mixed mode ventilation
NC-v4 EQp1:Minimum indoor air quality performanceposted by Nancy Henderson on
We have several high rise residential projects that use a several conditioning and ventilation system.
Valuation of Recycled Content
CI-v4 MRc4:Building product disclosure and optimization - sourcing of raw materialsposted by Rebecca Pinto on
I would like some clarification on how to calculate recycled content as the v4 Reference Guide is ambiguous, in my opinion. For example, on p.274 of the ID+C ref.
LEED Interpretation 5253
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Monique Belmer on
I'm working on an appeal and the reviewer is asking me why our baseline heating went up significantly between the initial submission and our review response model.
Denied EAp2
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Charalampos Giannikopoulos on
After two rounds of review our model was denied because according to the reviewer’s comment it still “it remains unclear whether the energy savings modeled for space heating are justified”.