Topic | Recent |
---|---|
Defining the baselineNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Gustav Alfaro on May 2, 2013, 12:43 pm
Hi to all: Please help me to clarify how the baseline model is defined for the M&V plan, it is clear that for the "actual case" the proposed model created for the EAc1 must be... Last reply: Leandro Silva, Jul 5, 2013, 12:56 pm |
|
Option #3 is added to EAc5 M&VNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Genko Ganev on Jun 28, 2013, 1:19 pm
I would like to find out what are the requirements for achieving EAc5 - Option #3? Thank... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jun 28, 2013, 2:02 pm |
|
M&V Versus Ongoing Sub-Metering & MonitoringNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Andrew Ellsworth on Jun 20, 2013, 10:35 am
I am glad to have a forum like LEEDuser to ask this question, since this has mystified me for many years. The M&V activities described by the credit language seem to me to do more benefit to... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jun 20, 2013, 11:32 am |
|
Cooling Tower SubmeteringNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Saju Varghese on Jun 3, 2013, 3:33 pm
Under the reference guide, it is requiring for process water to be submetered, which according to the glossary involves cooling tower water, boilers and chillers, but if the cooling tower is... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Jun 3, 2013, 4:44 pm |
|
Sub-metering in Option DNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Alicia Villanueva on May 3, 2013, 10:52 am
Marcus Sheffer posted some months ago in this credit: "You will need to calibrate the model by energy end use on a monthly (and annual) basis. Last reply: Alicia Villanueva, May 6, 2013, 6:57 pm |
|
M&V Plan for Residential ProjectNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Lauren Fakhoury on Apr 26, 2013, 11:11 am
Hi all, Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Apr 29, 2013, 11:04 am |
|
Responsible party for preparing M&V planNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Becky Dix on Mar 27, 2013, 11:41 am
What are the pros and cons of having either the MEP engineers or the... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Apr 10, 2013, 10:34 am |
|
EAc5 Measurement & Verification in Multi-family ProjectsNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Josh Chapman on Apr 8, 2013, 3:40 pm
Hi All, I am working on a New Construction, 299 dwelling unit Apartment building, pursuing Option D. All apartments have their own electric meter, paid directly by the tenants. The... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Apr 10, 2013, 10:28 am |
|
How to Determine and Overall M&V AccuracyNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Margaret McColl on Feb 26, 2013, 11:29 amMarcus Sheffer LEED Fellow 7group / Energy Opportunities LEEDuser Expert 5903 thumbs up February 26, 2013- 12:00 pm Make sure you have both a monthly and annual target for each energy end use. It is not sufficient to have only an annual total accuracy target. Typically the targets are expressed as +-XX%. The target can vary but is usually in the 5% to 20% range depending on the situation and the project. +-10% is a very commonly used value in alignment with Guideline 14. There was a post by Gord Shymko in one of these EAc5 credit forums with more detail on this issue. Might want to search the other... Last reply: Marcus Sheffer, Feb 26, 2013, 12:00 pm |
|
LEED NC 2009- EAc5- M&VNC-2009 EAc5: Measurement and Verificationposted by Genko Ganev on Feb 25, 2013, 1:16 pm
Would... Last reply: Tristan Roberts, Feb 25, 2013, 3:02 pm |