Dear all,

We're developing an M&V Plan for a large commercial mall. Every tenant will be equipped with an electricity submeter, connected to the Mall's BMS.

The tenants will be...

I am working on a LEED-CS 2009 project. We will reach Credit EA 5.2 Measurement and Verification – Tenant...

Hello,

One of the requirements of EA Credit 5.2 is to "provide a process for corrective action if the results of the M&V plan indicate that energy savings are not being achieved"....

What is a typical "centrally monitored" system? I have a core and...

Gordon Shymko Principal G. F. Shymko & Associates Inc. LEEDuser Basic Member 138 thumbs up June 16, 2010- 6:52 pm As I describe in the 2009 CI EAc3 M&V thread on this forum (see response to Julian Bott's inquiry), the CI EAc3 language has a number of problems. To reiterate: Rather than reusing/rehashing the NC 2.0/2.1 language Case 2 should have adapted the 2009 BD&C EAc5 language (also used for NC 2.2). It cites IPMVP Vol. III with specific guidance for the available options (Option C makes little sense for CI) and dispenses with the arguably flawed "old" list...