Hi Hannah, do you have an example of what the on-going commissioning test form should look like?

Hello- We're working on a building that is not owner occupied and the tenant has 48 additional pieces of equipment that are not a part of the base building that are currently only being monitored

I have a question regarding EA2.3 As I understand it, it appears that the ongoing Cx process effectively begins with EAc2.1 and EAc2.2.

Hallo, We are working on two projects located in Mexico DF. One of them doesn't have a BMS and the other has a BMS but it does not provide trend graphs.

We just received comments on a review of this credit I am trying to understand. For this project, we actually had an approved MV plan from LEED NC credit EAc5.

Our team sees benefit to doing both, and making a deliberate effort to place energy-items into either the "audit" or "Cx" category (so we don't duplicate too much).

In LEED NC there are explicit instructions as to whom is eligible to be the projects' CxA. I don't see reference to this in LEED EBOM.

We have already been awarded EAc2.1 and EAc2.2. To get these points we did a retro commissioning report. When we resubmit, we are considering going for EAc2.3.

From reading these comments, it seems like any work done EAc2.1 MAY NOT count toward this credit.