Dear all, I find these below in contradiction. If so, does anybody know which is correct? Supplemental Guidance to MPR revision 2 (1 Sep 2011) - MPR 3: "3.

To support this project we installed a geo-thermal system under an existing playing field that is across the street from the new building addition we are certifying.

Is it possible to submit to the Leed certification only one of two adjacent new buildings, an office building and an industrial plant ?

Hello everyone, we're facing a complex situation with regard to the determination of our LEED project boundary.

Our Project consists of land that is property of the owner.

We have currently drawn our LEED boundary to include all areas that our building/scope of work is impacting.

The owner has a land which is divided into 3 parts.

We are currently having a campus containing 11 buildings/structures out of which, 6 are going to be LEED certified.

Hello everyone, we are looking at the feasibility of doing LEED for subway stations.

We have a very large existing facility registered under LEED-CI which will be partially renovated and partially updated.