I have a question in regards to non-regularly occupied lunch/breakrooms. Default occupancy density for break rooms/ lunch rooms is 25 / 1000sf but break rooms are also considered non regularly occupied space. Does this mean that these type of rooms are exempt from the CO2 sensor requirement in IEQc1?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Yetsuh Frank
DirectorYR&G
23 thumbs up
August 7, 2012 - 11:47 am
That's correct, no CO2 sensors in non regularly occupied spaces like lunch rooms. As noted in the LEEDuser checklist for this credit, CO2 sensors are actually a poor air quality measurement tool in places that are not densely occupied because they are designed to measure CO2 generated by humans. Better to ensure delivery of fresh air through direct monitoring of OA.
Dylan Connelly
Mechanical EngineerIntegral Group
LEEDuser Expert
472 thumbs up
August 8, 2012 - 3:44 pm
Helena,
I am not so sure that break rooms/lunch rooms are excluded from this credit (or even should be considered non-regularly occupied).
The credit language does not specifically say "regularly occupied" anywhere, but rather says "Monitor CO2 concentrations within ALL densely occupied spaces."
IMO you would be pushing your luck on this credit if you don't provide CO2 sensors in break rooms/lunch rooms.
Yetsuh,
Yes, CO2 sensors in places that are not densely occupied are not required, but the question was regarding densely occupied spaces that are only occasionally occupied.
The CO2 sensors used in densely occupied spaces for this credit need only generate an alarm and not necessarily be used to dictate the amount of OA.
Yetsuh Frank
DirectorYR&G
23 thumbs up
August 8, 2012 - 4:07 pm
I happily defer to the engineer among us. We have excluded these types of spaces previously without a problem but, per your reading, it is probably best for Helena not to push her luck.
Dylan Connelly
Mechanical EngineerIntegral Group
LEEDuser Expert
472 thumbs up
August 8, 2012 - 5:30 pm
All experiences and opinions are welcome!
I think this regularly occupied space business could use a clarification from the LEED folks. We wouldn't exclude break rooms/ lunch rooms from our Ventilation Calcs, but it does seem to not fit into the definition of:
"Regularly occupied spaces are areas where one or more individuals normally spend time (more than one hour per person per day on average) seated or standing as they work, study, or perform other focused activities inside a building."
Helena Larsson
Sustainable Project ManagerSkanska Sweden
5 thumbs up
August 9, 2012 - 2:31 am
Yetsuh and Dylan, thank you for your thoughts on this subject!
If we were early in the design phase I would definitely not take any chance at this but as the building is already in place we might consider installing the type of sensor that doesn't regulate OA but only generates some type of alarm. In the IEQ space Matrix that you can find on usgbc's webside, all types of spaces are presented and defined whether they should be considered regularly occupied or not, pretty useful when filling out the PIf3 template etc. According to this sheet, break rooms are not considered regularly occupied. Again, thank you both for your input!
Hernando Miranda
OwnerSoltierra LLC
344 thumbs up
September 24, 2012 - 2:14 pm
To be safe use the one-hour rule, intended for schools, but applicable to any LEED project.
LEED 2009 BD+C Reference Guide
> IEQ Overview
> Compliant Space Types for Indoor Environmental Quality Credits
> Other Regularly Occupied Spaces
"This category includes all nonlearning spaces that are used by occupants for 1 or more hours per day to perform work-related activities: ...."
Included in the list above are: kitchen and staff lounge.
John McFarland
Director of OperationsWorkingBuildings, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
42 thumbs up
October 2, 2012 - 8:09 pm
Hi everyone,
I think Dylan is exactly correct that the credit makes no exception for densely occupied areas if they are not regularly occupied. In fact, these are the best candidates for monitoring CO2 in a demand controlled ventilation strategy. Since the design outdoor air is only needed when the space is fully occupied, there is a likely a huge opportunity to save energy while ensuring adequate ventilation when the space is either unoccupied or partially occupied. Care should be taken in determining the proper CO2 setpoint (note, it's likely not 1000 ppm or even 700 ppm above ambient - refer to Appendix C of ASHRAE 62.1-2007). Also remember that you cannot reduce the ventilation rate below the "building" component (Ra in Table 6-1) except when the air handling system is in the "unoccupied" mode. Other considerations include using accurate CO2 sensors, calibrating them at regular intervals and making sure the modulating outdoor air dampers are well-maintained.
Perhaps the irony of this credit is for densely occupied spaces that are regularly occupied at design rates, then Yetsuh is absolutely correct that the best means of ensuring a ventilation rate that meets 62.1 is to directly measure the outdoor airflow and compare the measurement against the design setpoint. A CO2 sensor in this case really doesn't help you much, but that's not how the credit requirement is worded. Maybe we can change that in the next version.
So in summary, stick to your plan and put the CO2 sensors in the lunch/break rooms. Consider using demand controlled ventilation (DCV) strategies to save energy. If done correctly, we can have our cake (good IAQ) and eat it too (save energy)!