Topic | Recent |
---|---|
IEQ commentsLEED v5 BD+C/ID+C: Indoor Environmental Quality Public Commentsposted by Emily Purcell on May 1, 2024, 10:43 am
Compiling a few people's comments here... Accessible Building Not allowing wheelchair lifts in lieu of ramps - recommend allowing existing lifts to remain... |
|
Can LEED V3 or LEED V2009 professionals satisfy LEED Innovation requirements for LEED AP with a specialty on Innovation?NC-v4.1 INc2: LEED Accredited Professionalposted by SIDDHARTH BHAT on May 1, 2024, 2:04 pm
Hi, Can someone guide me on whether a LEED V3 professional can satisfy LEED innovation requirements for LEED AP with a speciality on Innovation credit? Kindly guide. Thanks... |
|
Location and Transportation (LT) – Public Comment Draft, Page 10LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:06 pm
Granted a maximum of 10 points, this credit category is overweight, given that an existing building has no control over its location and minimal control over transportation alternatives. The... |
|
Sustainable Sites (SS) – Public Comment Draft, Pages 14 & 8LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:07 pm
There are no basic concerns with the Sustainable Sites credit category, as the credit/points are all within the building sphere of control. The credit category may be underweighted at 2 points.... |
|
Water Efficiency (WE) – Public Comment Draft, Page 17LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:08 pm
From an operations perspective, we believe the Water, Energy, Waste, and IEQ credit categories should have a more balanced point allocation. With increasing concerns over access to fresh water,... |
|
Materials and Resources (MR) – Public Comment Draft, Page 42LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:09 pm
This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies. The shift to... |
|
Materials and Resources (MR) – Public Comment Draft, Page 42LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:10 pm
This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies. The shift to... |
|
Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) – Public Comment Draft, Page 45LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:11 pm
While the total of 20 points for this category is adequate, it is overweighted toward the Indoor Air Quality Performance and Occupant Satisfaction Survey. How much weight should an occupant... |
|
Project Priorities & Innovation (IN) – Public Comment Draft, Page 59LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Commentsposted by Dean Stanberry on May 3, 2024, 1:11 pm
The term “Project Priorities” implies transactional activities. There is no recognition of operational activities. As this credit category represents an opportunity for an additional 10 points,... |
|
Expiration of product declarationsLEED v5 BD+C/ID+C: Materials and Resources Public Commentsposted by Dave Hubka on May 6, 2024, 10:11 am
Please provide clear and consistent guidance with respect to the expiration of product declarations. My preference would be to allow certifications that were current when specified to... |