The LEED reviewers, once again, have succeeded in exasperating me and my team. We submitted under alternative compliance making a case that our approach supports the intent of the credit and why.

How would a tenant who leases part of a floor in a high rise building meter their use of chilled water from the base building plant?

Reading through this forum I still don't think I see a clear consensus on recert vs. new cert. I have a client who was originally certified in 2011 EBOM and they are up for recertification.

Our project is a cafeteria which is inside the military base. All the soldiers walks from their barracks to eat or pick up food at the cafeteria. Can we use Option #2 to get 6 points?

We are looking to certify nineteen concession spaces in an existing airport. The spaces all share one mechanical system and one water source and do not appear to be sub-metered.

We are trying to respond to Prelim. Design review comments on a LEED-HC v2009 project for an Inpatient Hospice and Palliative Care facility.

So, back again to ask another one. We are ever so close to reaching 75% threshold and without having the engineers run daylight models or measure the space I'm trying to pick up any space we can.

We just received our design credit responses and used method 2 - Prescriptive. We have a 3 story cafeteria space within a 30 story office building.

I am posting my question here, since it appears the v2.2 ID forum is closed for new comments. I have a v2.2 LEED-NC Campus project working on the final construction submission.

Referencing 90.1 Table G3.1.5: I understand that the envelope for an existing building baseline model should reflect existing conditions concerning thermal properties of walls and windows.