Dear All,
I am unclear about something. If I have items that would qualify for MRc3 but we are not pursuing that credit, is it acceptable to count them towards MRc4?
Forum discussion
NC-2009 MRc4: Recycled Content
Dear All,
I am unclear about something. If I have items that would qualify for MRc3 but we are not pursuing that credit, is it acceptable to count them towards MRc4?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
The recycled content percentage on the product data sheet is given as a range. What should I do?
Is the default average recycled content value of 25% for steel still allowed?
Can site materials, such as soil, be included in the MR credit calculations?
Are there recycled content claims that I should be wary of?
RETIRED
LEEDuser Expert
623 thumbs up
March 25, 2015 - 6:19 pm
Erika - The short answer is no. You can only count recycled materials for MRc4. Materials that would have qualified for MRc3 (are reused) will not also qualify for MRc4. Maybe you were thinking that salvaged materials from off-site can be applied for MRc5, if they are regional. As can on-site salvaged materials.
Jon Clifford
LEED-AP BD+CGREENSQUARE
LEEDuser Expert
327 thumbs up
March 25, 2015 - 7:41 pm
This common misconception about MRc3 & MRc4 may also stem in part from the fact that, if a project cannot reach thresholds for Reuse Credits MRc1 or MRc3, It CAN count reused material from the jobsite as diverted construction waste under MRc2. Michelle & Tristan made relevant posts in the MRc2 forum: http://www.leeduser.com/comment/redirect/54905 & http://www.leeduser.com/comment/redirect/2548.
Erika Duran
Sustainability ConsultantDagher Engineering
72 thumbs up
March 30, 2015 - 1:30 pm
Thank you. The confusing part to me was due to the MRc3 "Bird's Eye View" stating: "There may be instances where a product is processed in such a way that it could be considered as under either attribute, but if that's the case you should still choose one; these credits are not meant to overlap."
I focused on the credits not overlapping and was thinking since the credit is not being pursued then, if there was a choice we could account for these materials in MRc4.
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11478 thumbs up
March 14, 2016 - 2:37 pm
I apologize for this confusing wording on reused vs. recycled—I have clarified it.
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11478 thumbs up
March 14, 2016 - 2:37 pm
I apologize for this confusing wording on reused vs. recycled—I have clarified it.