The MR Credit for Environmentally Preferable Non-structural materials is confusing to me. It says it is "1 point" but in the text it says a credit can be obtained for each attribute met.

The project I am working on is over the light allowance, but does not have any money in the budget to add mechanical glare control devices. Is there an alternative compliance path...

The lighting power density table and such is completely gone.

In LEED CI can we get one point for having LEED AP BD+C involved in the project or does it have to be LEED AP ID+C?

Here's a suggestion for the nice people at USGB / GBCI: for international projects using the SI system (International System of Units- metric system), it would be great to have LEED Reference Guide

EA credit 5 - Enhanced Refrigerant Management is currently denied in our project for the Refrigerant Impact per ton value exceed the allowable 100.

Yesterday I attended a great workshop on a new life cycle impact assessment ANSI standard currently in development.

First off, I apologize for the rather long-winded comments, but after having reviewed the proposed changes to the EA Credit: Green Power and Carbon Offset provisions, I believe there are several ar

I have noticed in the table above that a bio-based raw material must be FSC Certified, however, in the second draft of LEED 2012 it is mentioned that bio-based products must be "FSC PURE".