Hello there,

The term “Project Priorities” implies transactional activities. There is no recognition of operational activities.

Granted a maximum of 10 points, this credit category is overweight, given that an existing building has no control over its location and minimal control over transportation alternatives.

While the total of 20 points for this category is adequate, it is overweighted toward the Indoor Air Quality Performance and Occupant Satisfaction Survey.

There are no basic concerns with the Sustainable Sites credit category, as the credit/points are all within the building sphere of control. The credit category may be underweighted at 2 points.

This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies.

This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies.

From an operations perspective, we believe the Water, Energy, Waste, and IEQ credit categories should have a more balanced point allocation.

We are adding a Natatorium addition to an existing YMCA. In conjunction with this work, there will be new exterior lighting installed.

Is direct reading tools are acceptable for getting the parameters of TVOC, Ozone, CO2 and CO if the reference test method is complied with the LEED requirement?