Forum quick links
IAQ testing credit substitution backwards from 4.1 to 4.0?
NC-v4.1 EQc4:Indoor Air Quality Assessmentposted by Jeff Ross-Bain, PE, LEED Fellow, WELL AP on
Hi all,
Switching Options Post-Preliminary Design Review
NC-v4 LTc4:Surrounding density and diverse usesposted by Darrah Jakab on
We are pursuing Option 2 and received comments in the preliminary design review that makes this option not tenable, but we believe we can achieve Option 1.
Only FSC should count as a preferred paper product under Green Cleaning
posted by Nadav Malin on
In the Green Cleaning credit under Janitorial Paper options, both FSC and SFI are listed. FSC is global and holds to a high standard.
Last chance to comment on LEED v5
posted by Nadav Malin on
Weigh in on the second public comment draft of LEED v5 here. You can reply to this thread or use the "Post a Question/Comment" button to start a new thread.
Energy modeling of Seconday pump in equest:
NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by PURUSHOTHAMAN on
In my project, for the base case as per ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Sys-8, I need to model both the primary and secondary pumps in the chilled water loop.
Would a fieldhouse structure be included within the LEED Boundary
NC-v4 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by on
Our project is a community centre that includes a field house structure on site. The fieldhouse is partially enclosed, with the other portion covered by a canopy.
Multiple Cx Agents for the Option Paths
NC-v4 EAc1:Enhanced commissioningposted by Saagar Patel on
I do commissioning and I work at a design firm. When a customer pursues both Fundamental and Enhanced cx- my group would not be able to do the Cx of the project. However, we believe the
our friend Betsy del Monte (in Asheville) -
posted by Kira Gould on
I'm sure we'll learn more soon, but several people have asked on various platforms about how Betsy del Monte is doing (she lives in Asheville, NC, which was hard hit by Hurricane Helene).