Forum quick links
Option 1- Poverty Rate
NC-v4.1 LTc3:High Priority Site and Equitable Developmentposted by Jyothsna Giridhar on
The verbiage in the ref guide says at least 20% of population is at or below poverty rate of state, provincial, or other regional jurisdiction.
Pilot ACP 161 - Hourly based on location
NC-v4 INc1:Innovationposted by Heather Walters on
Has anyone had an issue with a supplier provideing a cavet in theri agreement that if Power is not avilable from the identified asset anouther will be used. Did GBCI have an issue with this a
Unrenovated Spaces in Major Renovation Project
NC-v4 EQc2:Low emitting materialsposted by Azra on
Hi,
CO sensors for residential and duplex units?
NC-v4 EQp1:Minimum indoor air quality performanceposted by Alokmay Behera on
We have a mixed project with residential and office units. Residential area has apartments and few (12) duplex units.
Materials Cost - Materials and Resource Calculator
CI-2009 MRc4:Recycled Contentposted by Ricardo Sá on
I have just received the final application review for a LEED CI v2009 project, and under the MRc4 & c5 the LEED reviewers stated: “the Actual Materials Cost for Divisions 3-10, 12, 31, and 32
Pilot Credit substitution via Exemplary Performance
Pilot-Credits EQpc117:Quality views in nonregularly occupied spacesposted by Jason Biondi on
This credit should be an option as the exemplary performance under LEED Credit - Quality Views
IN - Innovation Credit - Social Equity in the Community
CI-v4.1 IN101:Innovationposted by Joya Bhandari on
If a project owner has its own NGO association, can they be eligible for this credit? They work with local NGOs.
Thank you!
Distance to entrance within a large campus
NC-v4.1 LTc6:Bicycle Facilitiesposted by on
Working in predesign on a new construction building within a large site, wherein the site has only one public entrance.
v4 vs. v4.1 swapping question
posted by Aaron Kennedy on
So my engineer somehow did not realize we were utilizing 4.1. He did the entire project calculations based on version 4. We submitted for design review and of course we got dinged on th