Recently, IEQp2 for EBO+M projects are also requiring additional documentation that is not clearly requested in reference guide or on LEED Online.

Another issue with existing buildings is with previously existing permanently installed walk-off surfaces.

Will the GBCI accept the model if it is completed based on Title 24 -2008 energy standard in lieu of the T24-2005 or ASHRAE 90.1-2007?

Is it okay to pursue more than one path to obtain ID credits?

On the form for this credit, there is an option to upload IEQp2-RS1.

I am seeking clarity on this point given the GCBI's June 2011 update of MPRs and the current emphasis on defining a project "in it's entirety".

Anatoly, please see the requiements and discussion under IEQc4.2—I think that's where this would fall.

Our project is an existing 36,000 sf museum with a planned 18,000 sf addition. The existing portion is served by a dual-duct HVAC system with a boiler and chiller plant.

The project team of an office building is interested in using a new product called C/S Floorometry® 401 for the walk off mat: http: //www.c-sgroup.com/files/literature/Floorometry_0.pdf This is a f

In our CS project, we would like to develop a legally binding performance criteria for the tenant to attempt 1 point in ID Path 1.