Another question on a similar note: when documenting the toilets/urinals, is it the bowl (i.e. American Standard) or the flush valve (i.e. Sloan) that requires attention?

I saw Chrissy Macken make several comments on August 10th, but I haven't seen anything from USGBC since then. It's been a month, and the comment window is almost closed.

At the URL below are recommendations from forest activists in the environmental community for commenting on LEED 2012.

I am pretty sure you have 25 business days under v3, but is it 30 business days for v2.0 then? I can't find that information anywhere.

I'd like to have a clear understanding of which specialty will be considered 'most' appropriate for any given project. Can a LEED AP+BD&C 'count' for a project pursuing LEED CI certification?

I have been reviewing the 2012 Credit modifications over the last week or so, and I will try to produce some coherent and constructive comments in the official comment feedback before the 14th.

While I appreciate the intent of trying to establish a baseline ecological state of the world prior to the discovery of the Americas, I think the "Pre-Columbian reference is unnecessary and America

In the Water Metering prerequisite it says: "If reclaimed water is used for any water credit, that reclaimed water component must be provided with a meter (regardless of rate).

Overall, the prerequisites in this category are going to add significant cost to a base LEED certification over LEED 2009.

I asked GBCI about the changes to IEQc4.4 with your same questions, and the reponse was: The language in the addendum is meant for product manufacturers or project teams that are performing chamber