Forum quick links
Pressure Drop credit for DOAS system in Baseline
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Manish Khandelwal on
Hi.
HAP v4.5 and Hot Water Supply Temperarture Reset
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Matt Humphreys on
HAP version 4.5 is not capable of modeling hot water temperature supply temperature reset in the baseline case as required under ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Appendix G3.1.3.4 yet the software has been approve
Task Lighting
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Maya Karkour on
Dear all, I received the following review comment for my school project: "Tables EAp2.4 and EAp2.5 report consumptions for process lighting for both cases, but it is unclear what lighting has bee
EA Pr2 Form V5 - EAp2-9
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Robert Barrett on
My project does not comply with section 1.9A (minimum compliance requirements for process energy modeling) so I need to upload a narrative.
Addition to existing building
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by mital patel on
We have a existing building that is LEED Silver and we are adding to same building. New addition is also LEED Silver. Do I need to model both existing and new addition or only new addition.
EAp2
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Ema S on
Does anyone out there know what the following comment pertains to: Provide additional information (Mech-5C report) to verify that the Proposed Case Carrier units have been modeled at a 50% minimum
Space Summary - Table EAp2-1 Space Usage Type?
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Renee Shirey on
In this Table, are we supposed to list EVERY room in the building, or group similar rooms to together?
Existing buidling assembly
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by soham babu on
If we are not knowing existing assembly values can we go with ASHRAE 90.1 values for existing assembly. USGBC will approve ?
Does anyone out there know
Schools-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Ema S on
Does anyone out there know what the following comment pertains to: Provide additional information (Mech-5C report) to verify that the Proposed Case Carrier units have been modeled at a 50% minimum