Forum quick links
Defining the LEED boundary when an ancillary building is operationally and technically independent (v4.1 BD+C)
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Somebody Else on
Seeking input on LEED project boundary definition for a site containing two physically separate buildings: a main institutional building and an ancillary building serving a specialised operational
LEED Boundary (Excluding Retail from MURB)
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Padraig Bell on
We are working on a High Rise MURB that will have grocery store on the ground floor.
Zero Lot Line with required streetscape
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Elena Khoury on
Can streetscape can be excluded from a project boundary if it's required by municipality?
Airport expansion and Project boundary
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Filippo Weber on
Hello,
Existing Parking Lot
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Laura Soma on
If building next to an existing parking lot, which will serve the new structure, does the parking lot footprint need to be included in the LEED project boundaries? Assume there will be minor
Part of building certification
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Robert Yates on
I am looking to certify only part of a manufacturing building, which will be a newly built extension. In doing so, I'm wondering about where I should put my LEED boundary.
LEED boundary - disturbed land that will support more than the project
NC-v4.1 MPR2:Must use reasonable LEED boundariesposted by Kimberly Reddin on
Hi,