Forum discussion
For option 1, is it acceptable for manual controls to be accomplished via a software interface rather than a physical switch? In the vision for this project, users can control lighting in their area from smartphones, tablets, or computers but physical switches will not be present. Does this meet the intent of option 1?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Where do I find the CRI of a lamp?
Do task lights need to meet all the lighting quality requirements?
How limiting are the reflectance values in the finish requirements?
Do operable shades count as lighting controls?
Does having multi-circuit lighting count as providing multiple lighting levels?
How do I calculate an illuminance ratio?
Is Option 1 achievable for open office spaces?
What lighting controls are required for a conference room with a presentation screen?
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11478 thumbs up
August 26, 2017 - 8:37 am
I would almost definitely think so. Seems like where the industry is heading, and is consistent with the idea of individual control, and switches.
Allison Smith
Sustainable Design LeaderHKS, Inc.
42 thumbs up
May 2, 2018 - 4:14 pm
Ian, How did GBCI respond in the review?
RDK E&S
Energy Engineer / Sustainability SpecialistNV5
15 thumbs up
May 6, 2018 - 8:54 pm
The project has been pretty significantly delayed, and I don't believe we have submitted for review yet.
Greg Romanczyk
EXP18 thumbs up
July 20, 2018 - 3:51 pm
We were successful with the lighting being controlled through a personalized automation application, controlled via mobile phones, desk phones and/or personal computers.