Hello,
I have a Core and Shell building under certification that has 5 underground parking floors. According to LEED Reference Guide, page 612, "projects which contain underground and/or structured parking, may exclude that area from the gross square footage used for the calculation." Therefore, I have excluded it, since the FTE would be super-dimensioned if I included this area in the GSF. The problem is when I get to the EAc6 calculation. Since my GSF doesn´t include the parking, I am excluding its electricity consumption from the calculation. (GSF - USF)*35%.
If I change the GSF only for this calculation and include the parking area, the template will accuse the difference between the credits. Do you have any idea how to proceed in this case?
Many thanks
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11478 thumbs up
January 11, 2011 - 1:20 pm
Anderson, the page you're referring to is part of the Reference Guide's instructions on determining default occupancy counts, if you need to do so. Those instructions are not intended to be used throughout your LEED documentation.
Susann Geithner
PrincipalEmerald Built Environments
1297 thumbs up
January 11, 2011 - 1:37 pm
I'm not sure if the LEED Online form has changed recently, but we could enter the baseline building consumption (Owner portion of the electricity consumption). We calculated it for non-parking level based on the GSF and BOMA-Area (min 15%) and added the electrical users like garage fans, lighting etc. . That was our baseline for calculating the 35% / 70%. This approach was OK for the reviewers. We have done that in 4 LEED CS projects so far. To document it we have submitted a spread sheet to show the calculation with a brief explanation. Also be prepared to explain the differences between USF, conditioned, occupiable and regular occupied space.
Adriana Hansen
ManagerCTE - Centro de Tecnologia de Edificações
118 thumbs up
January 12, 2011 - 12:41 pm
Tristan,
In this case I don´t have the real occupancy and will have to use the FTE provided by the Appendix. Once again, if I use different GSFs, I will have different results for all the credits related. If I include the underground parking in my GSF calculation, I will need to have more Bike racks, my water consumption will be oversized, etc...
Susann Geithner
PrincipalEmerald Built Environments
1297 thumbs up
January 12, 2011 - 2:41 pm
According to the GBCI website and our past experiences, you can exclude parking area from the GSF. http://www.gbci.org/main-nav/building-certification/resources/fees/curre...
"Project Square footages to be used for Certification Fee pricing should be based upon the definition of Gross Floor Area which is provided in the LEED 2009 MPR Supplemental Guidance. However, all parking areas (whether underground, structured, or at grade) should be excluded from the square footage calculations used to determine the certification fee. Other spaces such as common areas, mechanical spaces, and circulation should be included in the gross square footage of the building."
This is why we have excluded parking areas from the total GSF and calculated the FTE based on this number. Also we always used the default occupancy count, which was never an issue.
In regards to the green power calculation as I explained before, we calculated the buildings energy consumption. As for the energy consumption of the parking garage, we have garage lighting and ventilation fans etc. separated out in the whole building calculation (ASHREA 90.1). That allows us to show the consumption related to the GSF and the parking separate. We then just add the parking's energy consumption as explained before. If all this doesn't work with the new LEED Online forms (we worked with the Beta-Version) then use the special circumstances section to explain it and upload your calcs. We have been advised from the LEED Online team and the GBCI to do so.
Adriana Hansen
ManagerCTE - Centro de Tecnologia de Edificações
118 thumbs up
January 17, 2011 - 12:45 pm
Thanks a lot!
Devendra Chaughule
Senior Manager - Sustainable ServicesSurmount
29 thumbs up
July 27, 2021 - 9:21 am
Susann,
Can you please provide the spreadsheet draft which you have submitted for the previous CS projects? devendra.chaughule@surmountenergy.com
It would really helpful for us.
Thanks.