Forum discussion

NC-v4.1 EQc7:Daylight

Daylighting for perimeter zones or all?

Hi,

Internal zones which do not have any external facades nor any windows are required to be simulated for Option 2: Illuminance? I have several zones which are considered regularly occupied zones but do not have any external windows/glazing. 

A walk-around I can think of is to model the doors of these spaces as openings/holes to adjacent spaces which are perimeter zones. This way daylight would enter the space through the opening. Is this a valid methodology for simulating internal zones?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/27/2024 - 14:39

I don't think it's valid to remove doors altogether. Often the doors are glazed in my projects, if not full glass partition. In that case, model single clear glass Tvis ~88% for interior glazing.  It's rare to see much SDA in this situation, however. Since you are relying on reflectance of floor, be sure that's accurate. Start with LM-83 default 20% reflectance. If the flooring material is higher, such as grey resilient flooring, get that data from manufacturer or measure yourself. Ditto for ceiling reflectance. 

Mon, 09/30/2024 - 05:26

All interior doors in my project are opaque. Can they not be considered as openings/holes?

If not, then the illuminance values for these spaces must be considered 0 for LEED v4.1 Daylight Credit Option 2?

Mon, 09/30/2024 - 05:56

All doors must be simulated as closed. If they are opaque, no light gets through. If they are glazed, some light can pass through.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.