Forum discussion

energy modeling with future weather files

Does anyone have a good recommendation for getting started with energy modeling with future weather files? We use a combination of Sefaira and Climate Studio, but open to suggestions. Even just links on how to approach this for making good recommendations to clients. Thanks in advance.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/06/2024 - 20:49

We use WeatherShift future weather files.  They are provided in the EPW format, so you should be able to use them in most tools.

Fri, 09/06/2024 - 22:08

Hey! WeatherShift uses a technique called “morphing” to generate future EPWs. This is the most accessible technique, but has some shortcomings as well. There are some open access approaches to morphing, which EHDD used to morph every EPW in the US. We were also a little annoyed that WeatherShift wasn’t free. Here’s a link to the complete library of files (for TMY3 and TMYx), a description of known shortcomings of ‘morphed’ files, and some other data we put together to explain some of the behind-the-scenes calculations: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I-hp6cB-cO25o9BX0tUIapW2MvIdR__SV9TE94-_3fg/edit?usp=sharing As we note at the header of the doc linked above, there are some great datasets out there for the US which use more robust techniques than morphing. You’ll see then linked at the top and bottom of the doc. Enjoy ~ Jack Rusk Director of Climate Strategy, Associate Pier 1 The Embarcadero, Bay 2 San Francisco, CA 94111 +1 415-214-7225 [cid:G_190118_N24_webview_bb0303a9-c805-4097-ac97-3ab99950504f.jpg] From: Cory Du

Sat, 09/07/2024 - 00:55

Future weather files that we are excited to try out soon are fTMY files. The data set, which came out in late December 2023, contains future TMY files for the 3,281 counties in the contiguous US for the years 2020-2039, 2040-2059, 2060-2079, and 2080-2099. The files were reported to have integrated a multi-scenario extereme weather simulator algorithm which will provide localized conditions of extreme weather including increased frequency and intensity. If someone finds out that is not correct please let me know.

Here is a link to find and download the future weather files:
States in the East and South at https://zenodo.org/records/10425621 
States in the Midwest and West at https://zenodo.org/records/10425146 

Thanks,

Mike Fowler, AIA, CPHC, LEED AP
Associate Principal, Sustainability Integration Leader | Seattle
Mithun 


   

Mon, 09/09/2024 - 14:26

For Minnesota projects: we are working with CSBR and the Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership (MCAP) to make available TMY files (and IDF curves) with the dynamical downscaled climate projection models MCAP has for the state of Minnesota. Likely delivery (data along with workflows and trainings) throughout 2025. In the meantime, for any Minnesota projects we are using the MCAP data set to do scenario planning & stress testing of our designs using historic and/or WeatherShift data: https://climate.umn.edu/MN-CliMAT

Wed, 09/11/2024 - 15:37

Thanks all for these great resources! On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:28 AM Ariane Laxo wrote:

Wed, 09/11/2024 - 21:15

I recommend the same source that @Mike Fowler mentioned, but I’d like to clarify some details about future weather data versus extreme weather data.   The future weather dataset, recently published by ORNL researchers through a joint project with ANL, ORNL, and SNL, is an excellent resource. You can find more details about the project here: DOE Report on Future Weather Data. We first learned about this dataset at the SimBuild conference earlier this year after speaking with an ORNL researcher. Since the project hasn't been widely advertised, it's still relatively underutilized. However, it follows a well-established methodology (similar to <CCWeatherGen>) to create the dataset. The most impressive part is that it covers all U.S. counties, providing future weather data under four different carbon scenarios (RCP 2.6, 4.5, 7.0, and 8.5). This saves a lot of time and effort for other modelers and researchers. You can access the datasets here: Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files.   In our understanding, these datasets mentioned above do not include extreme weather data. They are similar to the typical weather files we often use, where extreme years are excluded. Essentially, they represent a selection of typical (non-extreme) months' data, but projected for future years.   For extreme weather data, @Daniel Villa from SNL has developed a tool called MEWS (Multi-scenario Extreme Weather Simulator) as part of the joint project. More information is available on their GitHub page: MEWS GitHub. This tool is designed to generate extreme weather EPW files based on a typical EPW file and is particularly useful for heat wave analysis. However, according to Daniel, they are currently seeking funding to add scenario-based heat wave capabilities to the tool.   At Goody Clancy, we've begun using these datasets in our design process and research study. Based on our initial validation, they are reliable and highly informative.  We are happy to talk about it and share our initial findings if anyone is interested.   Jiewei

Wed, 09/11/2024 - 22:00

Hi Jiewei, Thanks for this clarification. I would definitely be interested to hear about your findings. Would a zoom call work? My email is simona@msrdesign.com On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 4:17 PM Jiewei Li wrote:

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 12:56

Hi Jiewie & Simona, I am also very interested in learning more about this topic.  Would love to also be part of a call, if possible, where I can learn more.  bdunn@moseleyarchitects.com

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 14:57

Same pls! psouza@wrnsstudio.com

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 15:09

Hi Jiewei, This is extremely interesting! I would also be interested in learning more about your findings. Happy to join a Zoom call; my email is: j.guarin@perkinseastman.com Thanks!

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 15:10

same here!  skim@designcollective.com

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 15:10

Me too.  cory.duggin@tlc-eng.com

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 15:57

Thank you for all the great shares and conversations in this chat. Hi Jiewei: Love to be part of the future call as well. Using these future models for "all things" scenario planning including energy is also my interest.  ysaoji@dlrgroup.com

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 15:57

I'd love to loop in my climate analytics team if a zoom call forms - beth.lavelle@smithgroup.com 

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 16:21

We have been working with the fTMY files to assess impacts to overall energy performance, and more importantly, the equipment sizing itself to deal with higher future peak cooling loads. If you are in the NYC area, I am leading a session at the ASHRAE Decarbonization Conference on Oct 23 to discuss the topic and present results of modeling using the fTMY files.  (https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/conferences/specialty%20conferences/2024%20decarb/ny-decarb-program.pdf)

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 16:58

I would join as well. Thanks. jhanford@millerhull.com Jim Hanford, FAIA, LEED AP BD+C, Principal The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 18:13

I'd be interested in listening in too. We've just started looking at these files now.  One thing I am wondering - (for those of you who have been using these files) - how is it impacting your design decisions? Is it leading you to do something that you wouldn't have done otherwise?  -Vikram

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 18:40

I’d be interested in joining, as well. Thank you, Lauren lgunther@dimellashaffer.com F

Thu, 09/12/2024 - 19:10

hi all, I would be interested to join such call as well (ccerezodavila@kpf.com). We have used morphed files in their multiple generations for years in the office, for both indoor thermal loads and outdoor thermal comfort modeling. Original using the CCWorldWeather generator from the UK, and later WeatherShift for a while, but WeatherShift base GCM became obsolete, and we have been more recently using the same modeling method that @JackRusk mentioned above.Have not tried the ORNL US specific files yet but they sound like a great resource!

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 00:24

Hi all, It’s exciting to see so much interest in this topic. We’ll follow up soon with a survey link to find a suitable meeting time for everyone in the next couple of weeks. We’ll also post an update in this thread once the link is ready. Looking forward to continuing the conversation. Jiewei

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 07:00

Please loop me in as well! Thank you so much: krkh@henninglarsen.com  

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 13:16

Me as well - thank you lkoehl@handelarchitects.com

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 14:29

Include me, too! I have some experience to share for energy modeling for various project types, using updated precipitation projections for stormwater, and also using the data for themal comfort outdoor modeling in planning or large scale site design projects. 
<anash@sasaki.com>
Alison Nash

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 14:53

Hi all, I'd like to join too with my coworker Miguel if a call ends up being formed. Can you add ksector@lakeflato.com and melizardo@lakeflato.com Thanks!

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 15:41

Please include me: jsilliker@nbbj.com (and I may bring one other colleague) THANKS!

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 17:14

I would like to join – heather@opsisarch.com I am interested to hear how accurately future weather files are able to predict increased air moisture, how well modeling addresses thermal comfort related to increase in humidity, etc. Heather DeGrella AIA, LEED Fellow, Fitwel Ambassador, LFA | (she / her / hers) Associate Principal | Sustainable Design Director Registered architect in Oregon [cid:opsis_rgb_blue_1c67de12-b325-4318-95e7-0704d8f48949.png] Architecture, Interiors & Planning 975 SE Main St., Portland, OR 97214 o 503.525.9511 d 503.943.6228 w opsisarch.com F

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 21:52

I’ve sent out a meeting schedule poll to those whose email addresses I could find in the thread. If you haven’t received the poll, please let me know. Feel free to forward the poll to your team members if they'd like to join the discussion. For anyone who would like to participate, you're welcome to leave a post in the thread or contact me directly, and I’ll make sure you get the meeting schedule poll.

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 22:12

Hey! I’d love to be added to this meeting. Very excited :) Jack Rusk Director of Climate Strategy, Associate Pier 1 The Embarcadero, Bay 2 San Francisco, CA 94111 +1 415-214-7225 [cid:G_190118_N24_webview_bb0303a9-c805-4097-ac97-3ab99950504f.jpg] F

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 22:14

I would like to participate in the meeting as well!  

Fri, 09/13/2024 - 23:23

Me too!  Thanks 

Sat, 09/14/2024 - 00:24

I would love to join the call. Please add my name to the list. 

Sat, 09/14/2024 - 12:23

Hi Jiewei,  Thank you for responding to all the interest and being willing to set up a call!  I would like to be included as well, hammmodley@vmdo-dc.com thank you! *Chris Colasanti, I saw info on the Decarbonization Summit in NYC and it looks like a great line-up, wish I was able to make it up from DC for it, but it looks unlikely this year. Will any of it be a available virtually or via recording after?   

Sat, 09/14/2024 - 14:12

Thank you for organiizing it. I would love to join. My email is teresa.jan@multi.studio

Sat, 09/14/2024 - 18:06

Please include me in the meeting, as well! kristy.w@branchpattern.com I look forward to this conversation!

Sat, 09/14/2024 - 20:43

Me too! krkh@henninglarsen.com  

Sat, 09/14/2024 - 23:44

Would love to join too! Dfavaretto@cannondesign.com

Sun, 09/15/2024 - 01:01

Please also add Ishac.koussa@som.com

Sun, 09/15/2024 - 18:06

Also: nicholas.chan@som.com Shona.odea@som.com

Mon, 09/16/2024 - 02:11

I would like to join as well. Thanks! Brendan Gardes, PE, CEM, LEED AP, WELL AP Associate Principal | Sustainability Studio Director BGardes@newcomb-boyd.com Desk: 404.730.8548 Main: 404.730.8400 Atlanta Ι Charleston Ι Jacksonville Ι Raleigh-Durham newcomb-boyd.com [cid:inc2res_b0c1b94c-0aea-4c85-860a-2287aec5f890.png] [cid:nbc2res_2d3ccd2c-d3bc-43ce-8283-01632c33d08d.png] Fr

Mon, 09/16/2024 - 13:56

Hi Jiewei, I would like to be added too. jshultz@pagethink.com Thank you!

Mon, 09/16/2024 - 14:17

Hi Jiewei, can you please add me as well? rriss@opnarchitects.com Thank you!

Mon, 09/16/2024 - 14:34

Jiewei, Please add me to the distribution. Thanks. Paul perickson@aeieng.com

Mon, 09/16/2024 - 19:22

Hi Jiewei, Can you please add me, Megan Zack and Zhongdi Chen to the survey link to find a time for this conversation? Thanks! jmlade@wightco.com mzack@wightco.com zchen@wightco.com Thanks, John M

Tue, 09/17/2024 - 13:48

Please add Alex to the discussion if possible. Alex.p.zuro@imegcorp.com Adam McMillen, PE, CPHC, LEED AP BD+C IMEG | Director of Sustainability [IMEG] 263 Shuman Boulevard | Suite 550 | Naperville, IL 60563 (630) 527-2320 | phone (312) 852-1360 | mobile (630) 527-2321 | fax Adam.M.McMillen@imegcorp.com website | my linkedin | vCard | map | regional news [Twitter][Facebook][LinkedIn] Learn more about us and the IMEG story! This email may contain confidential and/or private information. If you received this email in error please delete and notify sender.

Tue, 09/17/2024 - 15:05

Big group and "hot" topic, thanks for organizing Jiewei!! Could you include us in the invite? johnhyde@chap-con.com justinh@chap-con.com

Tue, 09/17/2024 - 17:34

I’ll hop on this bandwagon too, but given the level of interest perhaps we all stop emailing and if/when a meeting is set it’s just announced to the entire Green Commons? I frequently tell our engineers and clients that we need to design our buildings for the climate the building will experience in its lifetime, not the climate we’re already familiar with. We have utilized future-looking weather files a few ways on projects, such as to show the longer term impact on air-source heat pump operation and to inform energy conservation measure decisions (e.g. investing in strategies that reduce cooling energy may appear better when looking at future climate). We have tried a few ways to estimate peak ambient temperature conditions for sizing HVAC equipment, and are interested to see if there is any overlap with what others are doing. Would also love to discuss best practices for anticipating future precipitation given increased moisture content in atmosphere; the strategies we’ve used have had mixed results. Patrick Murphy, PE, LEED AP BD+C, CPHC Principal | Director of Sustainable Design R.G. Vanderweil Engineers, LLP T 617.956.4804 | C 607.621.8047 www.vanderweil.com [cid:image001.gif@01DB0905.B637FA90] [cid:image002.gif@01DB0905.B637FA90] [cid:image003.gif@01DB0905.B637FA90] [cid:image004.jpg@01DB0905.B637FA90] From: J

Tue, 09/17/2024 - 17:58

This may be a topic for the meeting, but I would caution designing your systems day one for a future climate. For instance, when you look at the Climate projections for King County - there is a subtle change between the twenty year sets See below from a singly family rez basic energy model. There is a change from heating dominated to a balanced heating-cooling load. However, if you design your mechanical system day one to tackle the climate 80 - 100 years in the future, you have a couple of issues
  1. It may not be relevant in today's climate 
  2. Mechanical systems have a lifespan of around 20 years - so you will get a chance to update it as the climate does change. 
Look forward to the discussion.    -V

Tue, 09/17/2024 - 18:13

Wow, another very hot topic and thank you to Jiewei for offerring to organize a call. Lots of planning is now happening in the background. In the meantime, if you would like to be a part of this discussion, please do so in this spreadsheet so that we don't continue to flood peoples' inboxes.  Thoughts or ideas to share are still welcome on this thread.  Thanks!  

Tue, 09/24/2024 - 14:09

Those who responded to Jiewei or this thread on future weather files just received a calendar invite. If you would also like to join us, the call will be Monday, September 30th at 2pm ET. Zoom details below. We will post the recording as well.  Topic: Future weather file share out: BG peer networks
Time: Sep 30, 2024 02:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88426586311?pwd=odqg583dvGzmyBxCPMKu83Q68baIDD.1 Meeting ID: 884 2658 6311
Passcode: 764959 --- One tap mobile
+19292056099,,88426586311#,,,,*764959# US (New York)
+13017158592,,88426586311#,,,,*764959# US (Washington DC)

Tue, 09/24/2024 - 16:14

About this meeting, I have been in conversations with some folks at NOAA who are also researching the use of TMY data, especially by architects. Is there any connection between this conversation and them? If not, is it appropriate for me to send this to them? They are really trying to learn more about how their TMY data can be used. Betsy On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:13 AM Candace Pearson wrote:

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.