Greetings to the Green Commons!
Those of you who attended Greenbuild may remember that during one of the keynotes, Ali Zaidi - White House National Climate Advisor, announced that the White House was developing a definition for "Zero Emissions Buildings" (here’s a [LINK] to a related Washington Post article). The draft language for the definition is included for your review at the end of this post in italics.
You will see that the definition is quite broad, short on specifics, and is currently focused on major operational emissions only. Which means it is missing a bunch of things that we know matter a lot to you all. Fear not! The White House is well aware of these concerns, and plans to address them over time, as our industry gets more clarity on the reporting mechanisms for challenging criteria like embodied carbon and refrigerants. The White House and the DOE are consulting with multiple stakeholder groups on the definition, and are planning on evolving the definition over time.
The White House (and/or the DOE) is scheduled to issue an RFI at the end of this week (~12/15) that will be seeking public comment on the definition, and they are hoping for strong industry support.
This is where we come in...
A small group of us Green Commoners (Jean Caroon, Anne Hicks Harney, Luke Leung, Kjell Anderson, Chris Hellstern, and myself) along with Tim Lock of OPAL Architecture and Kira Gould have developed an industry Statement of Support for the definition, and we are hoping that as many of your firms as possible will want to sign on in support!
Logistics:
We will be finalizing and formatting the document on Friday, January 5, 2024, and it will go out for public release sometime on the week of January 8th, so you have just under a month to secure any approvals you need within your firm in order for you to provide us with:
-
An individual and their title (presumably many of you)
-
your firm's name and logo
-
a ball park estimate of how many square feet of design/construction your firm touches each year
-
a ball park estimate of the gross construction costs for that square footage (if possible)
We ask that you drop this information at the end of the document, as you'll see that a few of us have already done. When we finalize the formatting, we will list all signatory firms in alphabetical order, and we will tabulate the estimated s.f. and construction cost numbers for inclusion in the statement.
Thank you for considering joining this advocacy effort!
Kjell Anderson (LMN)
Clark Brockman (Brockman Climate Strategies)
Jean Caroon (Goody Clancy)
Kira Gould (Kira Gould Connect)
Chris Hellstern (Miller Hull)
Anne Hicks Harney (Long Green Specs)
Luke Leung (SOM)
Tim Lock (OPAL Architecture)
----------------------------------
Draft White House definition for a zero emissions building:
An operational zero emissions building is one that has been verified to be:
-
Highly energy efficient,
-
Free of on-site energy emissions from normal building operation energy use, and
-
Powered solely from renewable energy sources (directly or through market mechanisms).
Criteria Details
An operational zero emissions building is one that has been verified to be:
-
Highly energy efficient:
The existing building's energy performance places it among the top 25% most efficient similar buildings in the market, based on measured energy use. A verified ENERGY STAR score of 75 or higher or measured energy use intensity (EUI) at least 35% better than median EUI (for buildings ineligible for the ENERGY STAR score) meets these criteria.
The new building's energy use is at least 10% lower than the energy use according to the latest model code. -
Free of on-site emissions from normal building operation energy use (not including emergency generator emission, transportation to and from the building, etc., but includes on site only electrical vehicle usage, e.g. forklifts).
The building's direct greenhouse gas emissions from on site energy use equal zero. -
Powered solely from clean energy (directly or through market mechanisms):
100% of the building's energy is from renewable sources (which can include any combination of onsite generation and carbon-free electricity with a power purchase that includes retiring renewable electricity certificates to achieve net zero, see page 2)
The National Definition of an operational Zero Energy Emissions Building (Version 1.00) is focused solely on operating emissions. It may be expanded in future versions to include other important criteria, like embodied carbon, as the market develops, e.g. A Zero-emission building
A Zero-emission building is one that has been verified to be:
-
Highly efficient in both embodied and operational emissions
-
Free or minimized on-site direct GHG emissions, including refrigerant and other fugitive GHGs
-
Powered solely from renewable energy sources (directly or through market mechanisms) and use offset as the last resort to achieve net zero emissions
Documentation through ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager
In the future, EPA's ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager will enable existing commercial buildings, including multifamily, to document that they meet the National Definition of a Zero-Emissions Building.
---------------------------------