See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

Existing parking lot, new LEED space

Default Avatar
Susan Reid
Architect
Interwork Architects
LEEDuser Basic Member
0 thumbs up

Our project is a build-out in an existing non-LEED building in a suburban office park - there is a shared parking lot for several buildings and we are not adding any NEW spaces. The space is Less than 75% of the total building area. Is it possible to still achieve case 1, option 1 if we designate only the minimum spaces and carpool spaces (via signage, perhaps)? Is it possible to get case 1, option 2...at all?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Wed, 01/18/2017 - 16:10

Yes, you can meet Case 1, option 1.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.