See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

Allocated Parking Space but Need to Pay

Default Avatar
SW LEE
Project Manager
LEEDuser Basic Member
2 thumbs up

Hi , We wish to attempt case 1, option 2, no subsidy. In the tenant contract, it mention, the building owner will allocate 17nos of parking space which each parking space will cost the tenant USD 50 per months/each. the tenant will offer this to the employee but the employees need to pay for the parking space. Are we qualify to get this 2 pt, as there no subsidy from tenant aka project's owner?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Mon, 11/04/2013 - 16:32

No, you would not earn the credit this way. The requirement is not to have parking provided, allocated, or subsidized. If it is allocated but not subsidized, that does not meet the requirement.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.