I am referring to the Supplemental Guidance to the MPR's; All Attached Buildings, 2) Treating Energy Systems.

I've been waiting to upload the drawings for our project until the revisions generated by Owner and Contractor have been complete, and the drawings reflect what's actually being constructed.

(Credit 4.1 states: 'Design the lot such that at least 70% of the buildable land; not including area under roof, is permeable or designed to capture water runoff for infiltration on site.' ) Is the

Since ID Credit 3 is an option under LEED for Schools, does this mean that if a project is not pursuing this, they also wouldn't be able to pursue an Innovation in Design credit for a Green Buildin

I have a project seeking certification which has approximately 750 surface car parking spaces.

There are no pumps or VAV fans on this project which are 5hp or greater.

For a LEED project that recently received the preliminary design review comments, we were asked to analyze and correct the documentation to comply with pre-requisite EAp2.

I have a school building with an old walk-in coolers/freezers used in the Kitchen. Those do have CFC refrigerant.

The following message appears if a total of more than one building is selected in "Number of buildings attempting certification as part of this LEED Application:" at PIf2: "At present, only one bui

We have included all areas of the building within the Default Occupancy Table. However, there is still the Plant Space we have not included. Can this be omitted?