Forum quick links
Additional information
posted by Barry Giles on
Since completing this version 4 Platinum we have been successful on a second V4 Platinum at One Sansome Street, San Francisco for the Barker Pacific Group.
Use of greywater
Pilot-Credits WEpc10:Sustainable wastewater managementposted by Noriko Nagazumi on
Hi all, We pursued Pilot Credit WEpc10 through Option 2, and planned to use recycled grey water for flush fixtures.This recycled grey water accounts for 100% reduction in flush water user from the
Core performance guide option
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by mohammed alshaikhsalama on
Hi, The project intents to follow option 3 Perspective compliance path Advanced Building Core Performance Guide.
ASHRAE 90.1 2007-LIGHTING
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Stella Stella on
Does ASHRAE 90.1 2007 have any code compliance for interior lighting LUX levels ?
Fan power settings of parallel VAV Fan-powered boxes in E+
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Shenhao Li on
Does any body know how to set "Maximum Primary Air Flow Rate" ,"Maximum Secondary Air Flow Rate" ,"Minimum Primary Air Flow Fraction" and "Fan On Flow Fraction" in energyplus to meet G3.1.3.15 "--
Zone Calculation Ds% for VAV System
NC-2009 IEQp1:Minimum IAQ Performanceposted by Marina Andrade on
I received this question in IEQp1: "The ventilation calculations indicate that the value of the flow rate of air projected under the condition tested (DS) was modeled as 100% level for each of th
Software model energy
CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by gabriel Morales on
Hellow We are developing an energy model for CS 2009 building and we have been offered a sfoftware SEFAIRA and we want to know if it is approved by the GBCI, to document and EAC3 EAp2.
Using VAV box CFMs as measurement of outside airfow
EBOM-2009 IEQc1.2:IAQ Best Management Practices—Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoringposted by Sean Blaevoet on
Will GBCI accept monitoring of VAV box CFMs as measurement of outside airflow during "economizer" mode?
LEED V4 delay is a good idea
posted by Lawrence Lile on
I have thought all along that LEED V4 changed too many requirements at once. I also suspect that numbers of LEED registered projects will drop dramatically once LEED V4 is required.
On the other hand ...
posted by Lawrence Lile on
I'll certainly not be shedding a tear to be losing the cumbersome LEED V3 LEEDONLINE website, with it's slow-loading, Internet-Explorer-only, buggy SAP interface.