Hi we are working on a LEED-CI for retail and they have exterior lighting power that doesn't comply with ASHRAE Section 9.4.5 which is compulsory and non-tradeable with interior lighting.

As I see it the major issue with this credit is the 75% threshold in MR 1.1 &1.3. Consider two possible assemblies.

Hello Heather, Your comments are just the kind of feedback this pilot process is intended to elicit.

If we pursue this option, are we only eligable for one point for this credit? That's what is coming up on my template, even though it says that i'm pursuing two credits.

My observations, from an international point of view, are as follows :- 1) A hard copy, in the form of a comitment by the engineer on a company letterhead with his full signature, will always com

Hi all, We are working on a project situated in the Czech Republic, Prague. Is it possible to go for Option 2 and use Prague Planning Office as a metropolitan planning organization?

As far as I am concerned, any LEED 2009 projects can get Regional Priority Credits.

It doesn't seem like this credit should be so complicated. We have a full DDC system in the new building, which is part of a campus.

Does anyone have any experience or guidance for documenting compliance with ASHRAE 55 with a mechanically conditioned, naturally ventilated building?

We have laminated particleboard also known as melamine panels which states it's formaldehyde free but has polymerized urea formaldehyde resin in it. Can we still get EQ credit for it?