Forum discussion

Pilot-Credits PC12:Reduced Automobile Dependence

Option 2, Outside US

Hi all, We are working on a project situated in the Czech Republic, Prague. Is it possible to go for Option 2 and use Prague Planning Office as a metropolitan planning organization? Furthermore it would be quite difficult to find VMT for Prague environment. Thank you for any suggestions.

4

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 08/16/2011 - 20:31

Since the primary metric for Option 2 is low VMT, not having reliable VMT data would make use of Option 2 problematic in this case. Option 2 is offered to encourage projects to locate in areas that are already experiencing higher than average rates of non-auto use (and by extension likely have more-developed pedestrian, bicycle and/or transit infrastructure). The metric is essentially calibrated for North American conditions and may be difficult to quickly translate to European conditions. Option 1 would be a better choice since the transit service metric is the same in or outside the US.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.