Forum quick links
Excellent, excellent, excellent!
posted by John Beeson on
Yes, Nadav! yes. although, the incentives you linked to in your comment here are… well.. meh… But, love your four ideas! Let's go!
Stunned at "backpeddling"
posted by Jodi Smits Anderson on
I was frankly stunned at the announcement that this would be pushed off based on market feedback.
5) Get LEED v4 Tools in Good Shape Quickly
posted by Melissa Wrolstad on
Typically LEED Online is not really "client-ready" until about version 3 of the forms.
Agree
posted by Emmanuel Pauwels on
Nadav, I was surprised as well with the announcment. The LEED V3 projects we are doing are way to easy and it is time for some more challenging targets specifically for the energy.
Designated Drop-off spaces
Schools-2009 SSc4.3:Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehiclesposted by Matthew Heaton on
Can all preferred parking spaces for low-emitting and fuel-efficient vehicles also be carpool drop off spaces.
The year of metering
EBOM-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by Vindio Corro on
Must be the year of metering after the registration of the project or can be used a year of metering of before?
Kudos to v4 manufacturing leaders too!
posted by Valerie Walsh on
Thanks Nadav for infusing some positive energy with concrete incentives in an attempt to recover from the fallout of the v4 delay.
Great post!
posted by Tanya Eagle on
Completely agree with your assessment, Nadav! Also, at this time, I think promoting v4 should be prioritized over the promotion of the LDP.
Does all of Section 1.6 results have to be filled?
NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performanceposted by Ivan Priatman on
Dear LEED, We are trying to achieve points in EAp2 scorecard via Building Simulation Method.