Forum quick links
IEQc5 requirements eased up
posted by Hernando Miranda on
"the vague hazardous chemical containment requirement has been removed." This is a layover from LEED v2.0. Rob Watson actually had a lot, if not everything, to do with this.
Residential projects ineligible for IEQc7.2
posted by Hernando Miranda on
"Residential projects are not eligible for IEQc7.2: Thermal Comfort—Verification" The USGBC needs to clarify this for mixed-use projects.
EQc8.1 Applicable spaces
posted by Hernando Miranda on
"Under the daylight requirements for IEQc8.1, the term "regularly occupied spaces" has been replaced by “applicable spaces.” We're not sure if this is significant—we have a question in to USGBC abo
square footage of all parking areas
posted by Malwina Mokrzycka on
Hi everyone, I would like to ask about 'square footage of all parking areas' on PI form 2: I am not sure which one I should choose square footage, gross or net?
Thanks for the responses so
posted by Michael Zagorski on
Thanks for the responses so far... Please keep them coming!
LEED ND GIB credit 4 - Water efficient landscaping
posted by Tyler Baker on
I am working on a residential redevelopment in a mature inner suburb.
4 floor building - 2 phases
posted by shawn jang on
I have a 4 floor building in china, it’s a manufacturing facility.
"Feet to the Fire"
posted by Julia Weatherby on
It's all too easy for an Owner/Designer/Builder team to say, "We are following LEED without getting certified." When it then turns out the building actually will be going for certification, many as
LEED plaque analogous to college diploma
posted by Edward Gulick on
If an owner/design team is making the claim that they are building to "LEED certifiable", we must take them at their word that they are doing the modeling, commissioning, and specifying associated
PIf4 Narrative: Level of detail
posted by Maura Adams on
What level of detail in the building systems narrative is expected?