The project is located within a building, its area is less than 75% of the total area of the building. The project has a chiller plant that only supplies the project area.

I am working on a project which is considering pursuing CI 2009 EAc3 Option B. I am wondering if continuous metering is required for this path or if spot metering would be acceptable.

Is there an alternative compliance approach to this credit? My project falls under Case 1 (less than 75% of the project space), but my client owns the floors hence the lack of a lease agreement.

Hello, we are doing a LEED CI project for a large tenant occupying multiple floors. We will pursue Case 1 (less than 75% of area) - submetering.

LEED-CI 2009 EAc3 Case 1 Online form has options for sub-metering or central plant. Does the central plant mean that the tenant space is served by e.g.

our Project is LEED CI v3 at credit EA c3, what is process uses ( electric) and process uses (fuel) ?????? another question , at our tenant space we have boiler fuel operated to supply under floor

This might be a redundant question; I'm sorry if it is. We fall into the Case 2 category as we're more than 75% of the building.

Hi we have a LEED CI project that is served by an emergency back-up generator that serves multiple floors. Is it really a requirement to meter emergency back-up generator fuel?

In Case 1 (project

Our tenant will have sub-meters installed on the lighting and HVAC electrical panels on each floor of their tenant space.