Forum discussion

Variable Flow Showerheads

2

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 04/29/2010 - 15:58

I could see USGBC going either way on this. As Bill Swanson said to me in an email, it could be similar to lighting where we are forced to count the watts of the maximum rating of the socket.On the other hand, since it defaults to 1.5 gpm you could justify using that, or using some scheduled combination in which you "guesstimate" how it will be used.Let us know what approach you take and how it pans out—and I hope the credit isn't hinging on this.

Thu, 04/29/2010 - 19:44

Thanks, Tristan. I was preemptive in asking this question as the owner is currently testing shower heads from a few vendors. We have tested this one (owner installed it at home) and highly recommended it to the owner. However, they have not chosen one yet. If the owner uses this one, I will let you know how it goes! If we did submit it, I think we would do so at the 1.5gpm rate. Our reasoning is this: The owner has flipped the switch to the 2.0gpm and could not tell a difference. Plus, his wife didn't even know that was an option!

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 11:38

If you go with that showerhead, you should be putting 2gpm in the form. You have to go with the worst case.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 14:01

April, if you don't mind me asking, how did this turn out for you? I'm in the exact same situation currently.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 21:44

Unfortunately, we ended up going with a straight 1.5gpm shower. This was going in a college dorm and the owner wanted the simplest fixtures with lowest maintenance and moving parts to potentially break. So, they decided to pay a bit more to not have a variable flow. So, unfortunately, we still don't know the answer to this question.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.