Has anyone been successful applying the impounding/receiving stream protection approach for a previously >50% impervious site? Or will we absolutely have to live with reducing the storm event runoff the 25%?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11477 thumbs up
August 30, 2012 - 3:58 pm
I want to second Karen's question. Has anyone out there used the receiving stream approach at all? Information on successful use of this approach has been hard to come by. If you don't feel like posting experiences on the forum, please contact me through LEEDuser.
Kathryn West
LEED AP BD+C, O+M, Green Globes ProfessionalJLL
154 thumbs up
May 30, 2013 - 6:07 pm
You will probably find this amusing: we just pursued this stream channel protection on a project and our LEED reviewer marked it "pending" and asked us for documentation for Case 1 Option 1.... even though we clearly pursued Option 2. Stock language is the worst! I have submitted an inquiry to GBCI customer service and hope to get this resolved quickly.
emily reese moody
Sustainability Director, Certifications & ComplianceJacobs
LEEDuser Expert
476 thumbs up
September 11, 2018 - 6:39 pm
Kathryn, just curious...what was the outcome?
Ivy Glasgow
Independent Architect and Specifier5 thumbs up
April 2, 2019 - 4:25 pm
Following this question too- We have a project with strict local EPA requirements for protection of the watershed. It overlaps this credit so we are hoping that will be adequate to demonstrate compliance with protection of the stream channel.